Laserfiche WebLink
Tom Fahsbender, 112 East Hilliard Street, urged the council to make bars, taverns, and bingo <br />parlors exempt from the ordinance. He stressed that the tobacco question was an issue of choice <br />and expressed his surprise that the issue was even being discussed by the council. He claimed <br />that the City was being intolerant of smokers and wondered aloud what had happened to the idea <br />of diversity in the community. <br /> <br />Misha Seymour, 1313 Lincoln Street, commented that the discussion was an emotional issue. <br />He urged the council not to let any businesses be exempt and urged bar owners to help their <br />patrons "kick" the smoking habit. <br /> <br />Lourdes Marte, 1313 Lincoln Street, urged that the ordinance become countywide. She opined <br />that businesses would profit more by the patronage of more nonsmokers. <br /> <br />Jack Dresser, 1715 Franklin Boulevard, spoke as the Oregon Research Institute's principal <br />investigator of the study done on the results of the smoking ban in Corvallis. He noted that a <br />study of the outlying areas of Corvallis had been done as well and projected that there would be <br />no significant impact to Eugene businesses if the smoking ordinance was passed. <br /> <br />Gary Parks, 2620 River Road, spoke as an Oregon Lottery machine vendor. He raised concern <br />that a smoking ban would be passed by the City Council and harm his business. He commented <br />that making adults smoke in their own homes would be worse for kids than if people had a place <br />to go to smoke. <br /> <br />James Hale, 1715 Linnea Avenue, related that he worked for a major grocery chain and did not <br />feel like he was a drug dealer by selling cigarettes. He raised concern that the enforcement policy <br />in the ordinance language was too strict. He urged the council to take a closer look at how the <br />ordinance could realistically be enforced. <br /> <br />Adam Bernstein, 1960 Emerald Street, commented that the ordinance was a civil liberties issue. <br />He remarked that it was not the government's place to control legal behavior. He added that <br />people had a choice to patronize businesses where smoking was not allowed and that the city <br />was going about passing the ordinance in an inappropriate way. <br /> <br />Michael Drury, 5015 Center Way, spoke representing the Black Forest Tavern. He commented <br />that the patrons that he had talked to did not like the proposed ordinance. He raised concern that <br />the ordinance would be too expensive to enforce. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey closed the public hearing and called for councilor questions/comments. <br /> <br />Councilor Rayor observed that the issue was an instance of people being dissatisfied no matter <br />what the outcome of the council action would be. <br />Councilor Nathanson called for more information on the OLCC Responsible Vendor Program and <br />how it would relate to the ordinance. She raised concern that there were many businesses and <br />organizations that supported worthy causes by contributing to the harm of others. She used the <br />sale of fireworks during the summer as an example. <br /> <br />Councilor Kelly thanked staff for its work on the ordinance. He called for more information on <br />separate smoking rooms. He noted that the Responsible Vendor Program had been taken into <br />account when the ordinance was proposed. <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 11, 2000 Page 11 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />