Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Parton said that the council had an opportunity to create a win-win situation by enacting the <br />smoking ordinance and letting businesses attract more nonsmoker business. <br /> <br />Suzanne Levinson, 1525 West 13th Avenue, commented that tobacco was a historical accident <br />and that the reason it was so popular was because it had been glamorized by Hollywood. <br /> <br />Lucas Mericantante, 2494 Blackburn Street, spoke as a bar owner. He urged the council to let <br />bar owners decide for each individual establishment whether smoking was to be allowed. <br /> <br />Clarke Hansen, 2974 Game Farm Road, spoke as a representative for ARC of Oregon. He <br />stressed that the smoking ordinance was not a black and white issue. He also stressed that the <br />decision belonged at the state level. He raised concern that the ban on smoking would cause him <br />to lose enough customers that he would lose his license for his bingo parlor. <br /> <br />Lila Adams, 1143 Cinnamon Avenue, related how she had lost her mother to secondhand smoke. <br />She raised concerns over the thousands of employees exposed to secondhand smoke everyday <br />and urged the council to think of statistics as real people. <br /> <br />Vicki Chandler, 618 South 34th Street, urged the council to keep an open mind when making the <br />final decision. She raised concern that ARC of Oregon bingo would lose its license if it lost <br />business by banning smoking. <br /> <br />Steven Esti, 1802 Lawrence, commented that the ordinance should be put to the voters. He <br />remarked that it was not a complicated issue and that the voters could decided rather than the <br />council alienating pads of the community no matter what its decision was. He reiterated his <br />suggestion of putting the matter to the voters. <br /> <br />Toby Hill-Myer, 637 East 39th Avenue, commented that he could not find a place to work since he <br />got sick from breathing secondhand smoke. He urged passage of the ordinance. He opined that <br />businesses would gain nonsmoker business if they banned smoking. <br /> <br />Martin Jones, 2300 Parkside Lane, spoke as a physician in favor of the ordinance. He <br />commented that he treated many victims of secondhand smoke. He related how he thought of a <br />list of people in ill health to come and testify against smoking but found out that they were all <br />dead. He commented that no one had the right to expose someone else to poison. <br /> <br />Tracey Olsen, 795 Willamette Street, commented that workers had a choice to work in or out of a <br />smoking environment. He also noted that customers made a legal choice to smoke or not. He <br />opined that his business would be hurt by a ban on smoking and that drunk driving would go up in <br />nearby jurisdictions. He suggested trying to get other nearby jurisdictions to also enact the <br />ordinance or to have it done countywide. He submitted a petition with 1,000 signatures against <br />the proposed ordinance. <br /> <br />Willie Saleeby, 2793 Powderhorn Drive, related how his business had dropped when he had <br />made it a nonsmoking establishment. He advocated for the idea of separate smoking areas. He <br />commented that loss of business would mean loss of jobs in the area as well. <br /> <br />Ward Chase Fairbairn, 550 East 13th Avenue, said that it was his choice to smoke just as it was <br />his choice to run an establishment that allowed smoking. He noted that he had created a <br /> <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 11, 2000 Page 9 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br /> <br />