Laserfiche WebLink
<br />19 <br /> <br />Appendix D: Open Comments – Categorized <br /> <br />SUPPORT FOR PILOT BECAUSE… <br />• Reduced reliance on cars • Can use for both recreation and commuter trips! <br />• They are fun! • More freedom of movement, not bound by a bus schedule <br />• Great last-mile option • Great option for people who don't feel comfortable on bikes <br />• Will reduce fuel use and relieve congestion • Helps those with mobility problems get around more easily <br />• Allow people to save money (gas, taxis) and create a booming <br />community if used properly with correct safety measures. <br />• Hope that scooters will push city closer to safer streets – <br />separated infrastructure, slower car speeds, more traffic <br />calming <br />• Quick and inexpensive travel • People from all walks of life using them in Portland <br />• Anything to get fewer folks driving <br />• Cars are the MOST dangerous thing - both directly and <br />indirectly (climate change) <br />• Continues shift away from car-centric to human-centric streets • Lower carbon footprint <br />• Great alternative to car when exploring cities • More equitable than car-ownership <br />• Using scooters in other cities greatly improved ability to travel <br />longer distances without impacting traffic • Privately owned scooters are already here! <br />• Convenient when don't have car <br /> <br />MAYBE DOUBLE-STANDARD <br />• Could lessen fossil fuel use, but also unsafe <br />• Higher set of expectations from status quo (read: cars) is impeding <br />achieving Envision Eugene goals <br />• Scooters have potential, but also have problems • Unfair to place such a higher bar for scooters than automobiles <br />• Waiting till it successfully implemented elsewhere • Apply same standards to automobiles as are asking of scooters <br /> <br /> <br />February 26, 2020, Work Session – Item 2