Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Kelly, seconded by Ms. Nathanson, moved to direct the City Manager to <br /> provide code language that allowed impact review of religious services on <br /> residential zoned land. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly said that he was looking for some level of review rather than an outright prohibition. He <br />said prohibiting churches would create a hardship and what he was primarily interested in was <br />addressing compatibility. He asked staff to provide direction on how best to address. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson raised a concern over other activities that would be held on a religious site with <br />associated structures. She asked if staff could provide information at the appropriate time <br />regarding the pending federal legislation related to churches. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Mr. Pap~ regarding the application of the motion to religious <br />schools, Ms. Bishow said that schools would not be affected since both public and private <br />schools are regulated the same under the land use category of "education." <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner said that he would support the motion. He stressed the importance of impact review <br />and also of impacts on the residential land supply. <br /> <br /> The motion passed, 4:3, with Mr. Pap~, Mr. Rayor, and Ms. Bettman voting in <br /> opposition. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br />Jim Johnson <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Joe Sams) <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 20, 2000 Page 8 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />