Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ATTACHMENT A <br /> <br />INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE PROCESS <br />Eugene .City Council <br /> <br />PURPOSE: The Intergovernmental Relations Committee (IGR Committee) exists to make <br />recommendations to the full City Council on State and Federal issues affecting Eugene, and on City' <br />applications for funding from outside agencies. A primary responsibility. is to ensure that th~~e is prior <br />City Council approval of legislative policy positions and grant applications. .: <br /> <br />MEMBERsmp: The Committee consists of three City Council members, appointed by the Mayor. Two <br />members constitute a quorum for th~ transaction of Committee business. <br /> <br />MEETINGS: The Committee meets as needed. The Committee meets more often when the Oregon <br />Legislature is in session, usually twice a month. <br /> <br />STAFFING: The Office of Intergovernmental Relations provides staff support to the Committee. <br />However, all City departments are involved in preparing and presenting analysis and recommendations <br />on specific issues. <br /> <br />PROCESS: <br />State: Regular sessions of the Oregon Legislature convene in JanuaIy of every odd-numbered year, and <br />continue for approximately six months. As each session approaches, the Intergovernmental Relations <br />Committee ~eviews' and updates, for recommendation to the full Council, the City's Legislative Policies <br />document,' based on Council goals for the community. I <br /> <br />The City frrst adopted a formal set of legislative policies prior to the 1985 session, recognizing from past <br />sessions that many staff recommendations were repeated from session to session, and that a great ' <br />percentage of a session's legislative proposals could be anticipated. Given that the City staff routinely <br />analyzes about 1,000 bills during a session, the adoption of policies prior to each session has led to a <br />significant workload reduction for the Co~mittee and the Council, and also has enabled more timely <br />l efforts in Salem. <br /> <br />Legislative advocacy is done on' the basis of a priority system. Bills considered to have a potentially high <br />policy or fiscal impact on the City are given a priority 1 position. Bills with moderate but still significant <br />impact are priority 2 bills. Priority 1 bills are those staff actively work on and priority 2 bills are ones <br />staff monitor in Salem. <br /> <br />During the session, bills that affect the City are analyzed by staff in the appropriate City department, and <br />a priority recommendation (along.with a recommended position -- support or oppose) is presented to the <br />Intergovernmental Relations Committee: When priority I and 2 issues are not covered in the Legislative <br />Policies, a staff memo is attached recommending a legislative position and included in the Committee's <br />agenda packet. Staff is present at the Committee's meetings to discuss the issues. Bills covered by <br />legislative policies are listed on the Committee's agenda. <br /> <br />Minutes of the Committee's meetings are submitted to the full City Council for ratification. These <br />routinely appear on the Council's consent calendar. However, items may be scheduled for ~ll Council <br />consideration separately from the minutes when the Committee is not. unanimous or at the request of a <br />.Committee or Council member. <br /> <br />. (over) <br />