Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Rayor thanked City staff, particularly Public Works staff, for its assistance with an unhappy <br />constituent living on an unimproved road in his ward. He believed that such an immediate <br />response saved local government time and money in the long-term. <br /> <br />B.Work Session: April 2000 Draft Land Use Code <br /> <br />The council was joined by Planning Director Jan Childs, Senior Planner Teresa Bishow, and City <br />Attorney Emily Jerome for the item. Ms. Bishow briefly reviewed the packet contents, calling the <br />council's attention to consent item motions, policy motions, and a suggested alternative method <br />of addressing the solar access standards, developed in response to the council's discussion at a <br />previous work session. <br /> <br /> Ms. Taylor moved, seconded by Ms. Nathanson, to accept the items on the <br /> consent list, with the exception of item l(b). <br /> <br /> a. Amend section 9.6410(1) to allow required off-street parking to be <br /> provided on the development site or within 1,500 feet from the <br /> development site. <br /> c. Amend the/-I-D and ~ND overlay zones to provide additional ways to <br /> encourage pedestrian enhanced spaces. <br /> d. Amend section 9.6745 regarding driveways to minimize the permitted <br /> area for driveways within required front yard setbacks. <br /> e. Amend section 9.5500(12) of the multiple-family standards, to require <br /> setback sidewalks along any public and private street adjacent to or <br /> within the development site. <br /> f. Amend section 9.6745(7) to clarify that off-street parking is prohibited <br /> in afl zones within the required front yard setback with the few <br /> exceptions listed, such as parking in driveways associated with one- <br /> family and two-family dwellings. <br /> g. Amend section 9.6745(7) to prohibit parking in any required interior <br /> yard setback in C-2. <br /> h. Delete section 9.9100(9)(a) Adjustment Review - Multiple-Family <br /> Standards to eliminate the aflowance of curbside sidewalks in multiple <br /> family developments even along portions of private streets that provide <br /> parallel on-street parking. <br /> <br /> The motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Addressing item (b), removed from the Consent Calendar items, Mr. Kelly said that he pulled the <br />item because, as drafted, it called for a conditional use permit process for Bed and Breakfasts in <br />R-1 and R-2 zones. Since the draft code limited such uses to two guest rooms in R-1 and four <br />guest rooms in R-2, he thought that the impact was too small to justify the conditional use permit <br />process. <br /> <br /> Mr. Kelly moved, seconded by Ms. Taylor, to amend Table 9.6410 to eliminate <br /> the minimum off-street parking requirement for bed and breakfasts and home <br /> occupations. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 11, 2000 Page 3 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />