Laserfiche WebLink
no objection. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Pryor, moved to drop the bill. The motion passed unani- <br />mously. <br /> <br />HB 2525 <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson noted Ms. Taylor’s interest in changing the status of the bill to Priority 2 rather than Priority 3. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman questioned if the bill was stating a particular development required so much school capacity. <br />Mr. McVey said that the bill was not well-written and was subject to interpretation. Ms. Wilson said the <br />bill did not seem to be gaining much traction, although there were many bills related to systems development <br />charges and schools. Ms. Bettman asked Mr. Lidz to examine the bill to see if it created a new way of <br />allocating the cost of capacity to new development. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman did not object to changing the status of the bill and recommended a position of Priority 1, <br />Monitor. Ms. Taylor and Mr. Pryor agreed. <br /> <br />HB 2638 <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to change the status of the bill to Priority 2, <br />Neutral. <br /> <br />Mr. Yeiter explained the council had a policy related to not limiting annexation approaches. <br /> <br /> The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />HB 2712 <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman suggested the City take a neutral position on the bill, which would essentially create a task <br />force that would make recommendations. It seemed not to have a nexus to the City. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved that the City take a neutral position on the <br />bill. <br /> <br />Ms. Keppler determined from the committee that its position would not preclude a City staff person from <br />serving on the proposed task force. <br /> <br /> The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />HB 2175 <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor moved to change the status of the bill to Priority 3, Support. <br /> <br />Mr. Rikhoff said that the bill, which authorized the Department of Human Services to use abuse and neglect <br />reports to determine the fitness of department employees and volunteers providing care, addressed an issue <br />not within the City’s purview, although it affected City residents. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pryor seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations March 9, 2007 Page 6 <br /> <br />