My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: Resolution Adopting Amended SDC Methodologies and Rates
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 04/09/07 Meeting
>
Item 5: Resolution Adopting Amended SDC Methodologies and Rates
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:53:40 PM
Creation date
4/6/2007 9:11:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
4/9/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~ Street Light Costs <br /> <br />~ Bridge and Other Structure Construction Costs <br /> <br />Cost basis assumptions and related factors are listed in Table 4. Specific system <br />valuation calculations for these cost components are reflected in Table 5. <br />Because new development trips will be served by a combination of existing and <br />new facilities, and because the costs of new and existing facilities vary according <br />to prevailing design standards and policies, the average cost per lane mile is <br />calculated based on a weighted average of existing and projected new lane mile <br />costs. The weighting between the existing system average cost and the new <br />system cost is based on new development's projected utilization of existing <br />system capacity versus new capacity-oriented improvements. <br /> <br />This weighted average cost basis approach also supports the development of <br />separate Reimbursement and Improvement SDCs. Oregon SDC law allows local <br />governments to charge an improvement SDC, a reimbursement SDC, or a <br />combination of the two. The Improvement fee is intended to recover the costs of <br />future capacity improvements needed to serve new development, while the <br />Reimbursement fee relates to the costs of existing facilities that provide capacity <br />for growth. <br /> <br />In determining the appropriate weighting of the existing system and future system <br />costs to be used in the development of the cost basis, projected vehicle trips <br />generated by growth were modeled and separated into 2 categories: <br /> <br />· Trips that conduct their travel entirelv on the existina Eugene arterial and <br />collector network (existing system); and <br /> <br />. Trips that rely on projected SDC-funded future improvement during their <br />travel on the Eugene arterial and collector network (future system). <br /> <br />Modeling and analysis of the future trips using this approach results in a split of <br />40 percent existing system trips and 60 percent future system trips. These <br />percentages are applied to the average costs per lane mile of the existing and <br />future systems respectively to determine the weighted average cost per lane mile <br />of the street system (see Table 5). <br /> <br />The formula for developing the street component cost basis is as follows: <br /> <br />SDC Cost Basis = <br /> <br />Avg. Cost Per Lane Mile (existing system) X Capacity % (existing system) + <br /> <br />A vg. Cost per Lane Mile (future system) X Capacity % (future system) <br /> <br />Table 5 details the calculation of the average cost per lane mile by component for <br />the existing and future systems. The development of separate costs for existing' <br />and new capacity allows for changes in building standards, system configuration, <br />assessable construction costs, and other assumptions between the existing and <br />planned systems to be captured in the cost basis. In developing the average <br /> <br />City of Eugene SDc Methodologies <br /> <br />Transportations <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.