My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 10/25/00 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2000
>
CC Minutes - 10/25/00 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:32:11 AM
Creation date
8/1/2005 2:50:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Kelly suggested as a friendly amendment that existing uses be grandfathered as long as the <br />square footage of the development site involved did not increase. Ms. Bettman and Ms. Taylor <br />accepted the proposed friendly amendment. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly noted that the motion spoke to commercial use only. <br /> <br />Mr. Rayor pointed out that farm animals were allowed in the R-1 zone and determined from Ms. <br />Bishow that the motion would not change that. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Mr. Rayor, Ms. Bishow said that if the council prohibited a use <br />currently allowed in a zone, it was a message to the operator of that use that he should go <br />elsewhere. The operation can continue, but could not expand or increase in intensity. She <br />added that the council might want to consider where the uses in question should go if not in <br />residential zones. Mr. Kelly suggested that equestrian uses should locate outside the city as he <br />considered them rural in nature. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ asked if golf courses were an outright use in any zone. Ms. Bishow said no. The draft <br />code requires golf courses to get a conditional use permit in R-1 and no longer allows them in the <br />other residential zones. She added that golf courses often were a Iow-impact use, and were <br />considered an amenity for neighbors as they provided a type of open space. Mr. Pap~ was <br />concerned that golf courses were not allowed outright in any zone. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman pointed out that golf courses were an allowed use in a PUD, so if a developer <br />wanted to devote 15 acres of a 30-acre residentially zoned parcel to a golf course, that could <br />occur. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey asked about the impact of the motion on the proposed residential planned unit <br />development that was to include a golf course near Ayres Road. Ms. Bishow said that the <br />developer could rezone the agricultural portion of the property to R-1 and go through the PUD <br />process. She noted that the PUD could include just a golf course; a PUD in R-1 by its nature did <br />not require that a minimum residential density be achieved. Mr. Jacobson added that if the <br />property were rezoned to Iow-density residential, the Willakenzie Plan required that the property <br />in question go through the PUD process. <br /> <br /> The motion passed unanimously, 6:0. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Kelly, moved to direct the City Manager to <br /> amend Table 9.2740 to prohibit Golf Driving Ranges in any residential zone. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly offered the same friendly amendment he had previously offered. Ms. Bettman accepted <br />the friendly amendment, noting it had been her original intention to grandfather in such uses on <br />the existing development sites. <br /> <br /> The motion passed unanimously, 6:0. <br /> <br /> Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Kelly, moved to direct the City Manager to <br /> amend Table 9.2740 to permit only in nodal development areas appropriate <br /> Government Uses in R-3, R-4, C-2, C-3, C-4, I-1, and I-2. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 25, 2000 Page 5 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.