Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Rayor asked if the motion was similar to the council's direction in massing a building toward <br />the street in commercial zones. Ms. Bishow said yes. Ms. Childs likened the motion to what the <br />City Council did in the \TD and \ND overlay. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said the intent of the motion was to stop Eugene residents from using front yards of <br />residential structures for parking. <br /> <br /> The motion passed unanimously, 6:0. <br /> <br /> Mr. Kelly, seconded by Mr. Meisner, moved to direct the City Manager to <br /> amend Table 9.2740 and section 9.2750 to allow Assisted Living uses to <br /> meet minimum density residential requirements. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly drew a distinction between nursing homes, which he considered primarily a medical <br />facility that was residential in nature, and assisted living, which was residential in nature. He <br />believed that it made sense to count the density in such facilities toward the City's overall density <br />goals. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Bettman, Ms. Bishow said that the motion would not be <br />applicable in R-1 zones, where there was no minimum density requirement. She thought the <br />motion was needed following the council's decision to require clinics in residential areas to <br />achieve minimum residential densities. There was a rationale for those facilities to do assisted <br />living facilities rather than other kinds of housing, and she wanted to allow developers to be able <br />to count the people living there toward the density requirement. <br /> <br />Ms. Childs said if the intent of the motion was to allow developers to count those units to meet a <br />minimum density requirement that was fine, but there were State laws that precluded the City <br />from requiring minimum densities in assisted living facilities. <br /> <br /> The motion passed unanimously, 6:0. <br /> <br /> Mr. Kelly, seconded by Ms. Bettman, moved to direct the City Manager to <br /> amend section 9.5500(2) Applicability of Multiple-Family Standards to indicate <br /> the standards shall apply in the following circumstances: <br /> a. In residentially zoned areas, all multiple-family developments shall <br /> comply with the multiple-family standards, except for building <br /> alterations (interior remodels) and building additions that increase the <br /> square footage of living area by less than 50 percent. In cases where <br /> the standards apply, they shall be considered applicable for the portion <br /> of the development site impacted by the proposed development. <br /> b. In non-residential zones, all multiple-family developments shall comply <br /> with the multiple-family standards if the building is entirely in residential <br /> use. In cases where the building has both residential and <br /> nonresidential uses, the multiple-family standards shall apply unless <br /> the entire ground floor is in nonresidential use, excluding areas for an <br /> interior lobby or access to upper floors. The multiple-family standards <br /> shall not apply to building alterations (interior remodels) and building <br /> additions that increase the square footage of living area by less than <br /> 50 percent. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council October 25, 2000 Page 9 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />