Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES – Eugene City Council Work Session January 29, 2020 Page 1 <br />MINUTES <br />Eugene City Council <br />Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue <br />Eugene, Oregon 97401 <br />January 29, 2020 <br />12:00 p.m. <br />Councilors Present: Betty Taylor, Emily Semple, Alan Zelenka, Jennifer Yeh, Mike Clark, Greg Evans, Claire Syrett, Chris Pryor Emily Semple opened the January 29, 2020, work session of the Eugene City Council in Mayor Vinis’ absence. <br />1.WORK SESSION: Urban Reserves PlanningSenior Planner Rebecca Gershow and Planning Director Alissa Hansen gave an update regarding theurban reserves project, including outreach process, study area, land supply, land suitability, anddevelopment options.Council Discussion: <br />•Councilor Clark – asked questions about the legal reasons for amending the Metro Plan;requested a timeline for when the process would be completed; asked if there had been policyassumptions made previously and if they had been voted on; voiced strong concerns about theuse of Portland State’s numbers, without consideration of other factors. <br />•Councilor Zelenka – addressed the policy assumptions question raised by Councilor Clark;stated that this was to be a regularly scheduled process; asked about the development optionsand requested more detail; questioned the removal of the south airport section. <br />•Councilor Pryor – clarified that the lands are based on suitability and not affordability;questioned the ability to research which lands could be developed at a lower cost; encouragedconsideration of affordability of development when looking at the 400 acres, to help with theaffordability housing issue. <br />•Councilor Semple – agreed with Councilor Pryor’s position on the affordability issue;questioned the population estimate numbers in the presentation; asked if the urban reserveswill need to be adjusted based on the numbers. <br />•Councilor Clark – appreciated what Councilor Pryor stated about affordability; questioned thegrowth and population number differences; discussed the average population calculationsprovided by PSU and asked what can be done if the numbers are radically off; spoke about thefrequency of the PSU numbers and the long-term effect on some policy decisions. <br />•Councilor Zelenka– reminded council of the previous Urban Growth Boundary planningprocess; asked about the triple bottom line sounding board and the outcome of the analysis;asked if some of the areas will be being taken out of the analysis as the result of feedback fromthe group; said that it is the committees’ purpose to delve into the details, further and asked forthe names and the groups who were involved. <br />•Councilor Taylor – concurred with Councilor Zelenka about wanting to know who was in themeetings; expressed concern about climate change and the preservation of the open space,forest and agricultural land; spoke about single and multi-family options and limiting what andwhere to build; expressed disappointment about having the urban reserves and supportedpreserving the urban growth boundary <br />ATTACHMENT F <br />March 9, 2020, Meeting - Item 2ACC Agenda - Page 19