Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Updated 02-07, based <br />Personal Income Tax <br /> <br />upon 09-01 economic <br />data <br /> <br />Brief Description A tax on income of residents of Eugene and nonresidents earning income in Eugene. <br />of Funding <br />Option <br /> <br /> <br />Prior City A personal income tax on incomes above $100,000 to fund public safety services was <br />Actions and considered and rejected by City Council in July of 1996. <br />History <br /> <br /> <br />In the Fall of 1997, City Council formed the Council Committee on Finance to review <br />multiple revenue sources that would stabilize the General Fund after the impact of <br />Measure 50. The committee reviewed multiple revenue sources and ultimately <br />recommended that Council direct staff to develop an implementation plan for a business <br />and personal income tax. Although Council took no action on the recommendation, this <br />effort contributed to the allocation of Urban Renewal funds to the new library and the <br />successful passage of the Parks and Open Spaces Bond Measure. <br /> <br />Experience in Although there are no personal income tax precedents in Oregon, local governments do <br />Other levy personal income taxes in other states. <br />Jurisdictions <br /> <br /> <br />In November 1999, Lane County proposed an 8% income tax surcharge to support <br />public safety needs. In Lane County, the measure failed 74% - no, 26% - yes; in <br />Eugene it failed 68% -no, 32% - yes. <br /> <br />In November of 2006, Lane County proposed a 1.4% annual tax on income to support <br />public safety needs. In Lane County and Eugene the measure failed 51% - no, 49% - <br />yes. <br /> <br />Lane County has placed an income tax measure on the May 15, 2007 ballot. The <br />proposal would tax personal, nonresident, and business income at a rate of 1.1%, with <br />revenues dedicated to public safety. <br /> <br />Calculation Base The tax could be a percentage tax on Adjusted Gross Income or alternatively the tax <br />and Typical could be levied as a percentage of the taxpayer’s state income tax liability. <br />Rates <br /> <br /> <br />Estimated Based upon the following 2001 data, a Eugene surcharge of 3 % would raise about $8 <br />Revenue Yield million: assuming that approximately 68% of Lane County income is earned within <br /> <br />Eugene or by Eugene residents, a 1 % tax on Adjusted Gross Income would generate <br />$43 million. Alternatively, a Eugene income tax could be levied as a percentage of the <br />taxpayer’s state income tax liability. A Eugene surcharge of 10 % would raise about <br />$27 million for fiscal year 2002-03. <br /> <br />Will the tax be practical to administer <br />: If the Lane County income tax is enacted, the <br />Administrative <br />City could piggyback on the County piece or potentially contract with the State and <br />Effort and <br />piggyback on the state income tax. <br />Efficiency <br /> <br />What are the estimated costs to administer <br />: To be determined based upon collection <br />method. <br /> <br /> <br />