My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4900
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2007 No. 4898-4922
>
Resolution No. 4900
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:50:21 PM
Creation date
4/13/2007 12:06:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
4/9/2007
Document_Number
4900
CMO_Effective_Date
5/7/2007
Author
Mary H. Feldman
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />calculation. Costs allocated to existing customers must be paid through some other funding <br />sources (e.g., existing reserves or future user rates). <br /> <br />As indicated in Figure 3, the allocation of project costs to growth is a function of the type of <br />project and a detailed capacity analysis that identifies growth's share of: 1) planned capacity <br />expansion, and 2) total future load. . <br /> <br />Costs by capacity parameter are allocated to growth as follows: <br /> <br />Capacity Projects: Growth's share 8fcapacity expansion (%) X project cost ($) <br /> <br />Performance Upgrades: Growth's share of total future System capacity (%) X project cost ($) <br /> <br />Rehabilitation Projects: Allocation to growth = 0% <br /> <br />Where: <br /> <br />1. Growth's share of capacity expansion = Projected growth capacity requirement (not met <br />by existing available capacity) divided by additional capacity to be added to the system <br />by planned improvements. <br /> <br />.2. Growth's share of total future system capacity = Projected growth capacity requirement <br />(total) divided by total future system capacity requirement. <br /> <br />Table 6 summarizes the growth allocation percentages by project type. The documentation <br />for these figures is provided in Appendix C. <br /> <br />TABLE 6 <br />Growth AJlocation Percentages by Project Type <br />Project Type Average Flow Peak Flow BOD TSS <br />Capacity (growth's share of capacity 100% 29.4% 100% 100%. <br />expansion) <br />Performance (growths share of total 26.1% 10.8% 25.9% 26.1% <br />future system capacity) <br />Rehabilitation 0% 0% 0% 0% <br />Source: 2004 F acUities Plan <br /> <br />Step Four. Adjustments <br /> <br />The methodology includes the following adjustments to the reimbursement and <br />improvement fee cost bases: <br /> <br />. Gifts or grants from federal or state government or private persons. Existing (and if <br />applicable in the future, planned) asset costs are reduced by the percent of the asset that <br />is funded by grants. <br /> <br />. Ratemaking principles employed to finance'the capital impro:vements. Projected <br />capital financing cost (i.e., interest expense) is added to the cost basis, based on the <br />recommended project phasing anp. the need to borrow funds. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.