My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4900
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2007 No. 4898-4922
>
Resolution No. 4900
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:50:21 PM
Creation date
4/13/2007 12:06:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
4/9/2007
Document_Number
4900
CMO_Effective_Date
5/7/2007
Author
Mary H. Feldman
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />other parameter not represented by BOD or TSS such as screenings, grit, or pathogens? <br />These questions are answered by the functional performance component. The design basis <br />considers what system capacity parameter or combination of parameters drives the sizing of <br />the facility and, therefore, the constructed cost. The allocation basis for each facility <br />. component presented in Table 3 combines both the functional performance and design basis <br />considerations. In addition to these system parameters, because there can be projects that <br />provide overall support for the wastewater system, a separate category of "indirect" <br />. support facilities is used to provide for reallocation of these support-type costs across all of <br />the system capacity parameters. <br /> <br />TABLE 3 <br />Summary of Facility Process Component Allocation to System Capacity Parameters <br /> <br /> System Capacity Parameter <br /> Average Peak <br />Facility Process Component Flow Flow BOD TSS Indirect Total <br />Collection system pipeline % * 1 <br />Collection system pump stations % * 1 <br />Preliminary treatment % *. 1 <br />Primary treatment % % % 1 <br />Secondary treatment % Y2 % 1 <br />Disinfection/outfall % * 1 <br />Biosolids (same for all three subcomponents) % % 1 <br />Tertiary filters % % % 1 <br />Reuse facilities 1 1 <br />Odor control % % 1 <br />Peak flow management <br />Support facilities (Indirects) 1 <br /> <br />Step Two. Growth Capacity Requirements <br /> <br />In developing SDCs, costs relatedto growth (see 'Cost Basis' below) are spread over <br />growth's total capacity requirements over the study period to determine the overall cost per <br />unit of growth by capacity measure. The study period is defined as a 20-year period, <br />consistent with facility planning requirements. The Department of Environmental Quality <br />(DEQ) stipulates that entities that own and operate wastewater facilities assume a 20-year <br />plamUng horizon when developing facility plans (see DEQ Guidance for Development of <br />Wastewater Facilities Plans, 2000). <br /> <br />To determine the capacity required by growth, the capacity required by existing users is <br />subtracted from the capacity projected in the facility plan to be required at the end of the <br />planning period. For peak flow estimates, existing users' current capacity requirements are <br />adjusted for anticipated III reductions (see Guidelines for the Preparation of Facilities Plans <br />and Environmental Reports for Community Wastewater Projects, 1999). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.