My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 01/22/07 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2007
>
CC Minutes - 01/22/07 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:27:58 AM
Creation date
4/17/2007 2:10:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/22/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
? <br /> Garbage truck tax – documentation of the effect of trucks on residential streets was available and <br />could provide a rationale for a surcharge. A ten percent tax would generate approximately $1 mil- <br />lion annually. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor commented that business trips were only a fraction of the miles driven in a community; the <br />majority of trips related to family and personal activities. Relative to the issue of who should pay for <br />—— <br />transportation system improvementsusers or the community as a wholehe said the transportation system <br />was a civic need and community responsibility like police, fire, and education. He said demand management <br />could meet part of the goal by reducing vehicle trips but could not address all transportation system needs. <br />He agreed with the importance of accommodating bicycles and pedestrians but the $110 million backlog of <br />street projects required that to be the focus of the City’s attention. Regarding one-time versus ongoing <br />expenses, he said the City had to develop a mixed funding strategy that considered all of the options <br />presented by staff. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor stated she was pleased the commuter tax was listed as a possibility and hoped it would be <br />seriously considered. She did not feel that decreasing the disposable income of nonresidents was relevant as <br />other taxes within the City decreased the disposable income of residents. She strongly encouraged the <br />commuter tax as part of the funding strategy. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka pointed out that data indicated half of the 80,000 jobs in Eugene were held by nonresidents and <br />any fee or taxed imposed would only fall on the half who lived in the City; the other half would pay nothing, <br />but still use streets. He said that also meant the half who were taxed were subsidizing the other half who <br />were nonresidents. He urged a funding mechanism that would provide transportation system support from <br />both residents and nonresidents. He said the transportation system included cars, bicycles, trucks, <br />pedestrians, and buses and that should be taken into account. He urged a connection between how the <br />funding would be used and where it came from. He said there was a direct connection between a fuel tax <br />and use of the streets but a tenuous connection with a property tax levy. He did not feel the value of a house <br />or business had any relationship to use of the roads. He said the TSMF had a better connection but was not <br />fair to those who did not drive cars on the roads and used other modes of transportation. He preferred a <br />carbon tax or one based on miles driven. <br /> <br />Mr. Corey observed that the idea that only those with vehicles benefited from the transportation system was <br />at odds with the findings of an earlier Citizen Budget Subcommittee report on the issue. He said the basis of <br />the TSMF recognized that there were people who did not drive cars but did use sidewalks, bike paths and <br />transit and therefore the gas tax component placed a greater burden on those who used the street. He said <br />the report concluded that everyone who lived in the City benefited from the road system through delivery of <br />mail, goods and services, transit and other services, whether or not they drove a vehicle. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman noted that the $53 million backlog of preservation projects in 2001 had doubled and stated that <br />the transportation system as designed was not sustainable and would also siphon funds from other services <br />unless there was a way to balance funding among transportation modes. She did not think the options <br />provided by staff accomplished that. She said the transportation system served everyone but at drastically <br />different levels. She said what the council was trying to encourage with its long-term sustainability goals for <br />transportation should be built into the funding strategy. She would consider options that were equitable and <br />sustainable. Ms. Bettman said the commuter tax was defined as a tax on income but it should be a fee that <br />paralleled whatever fee was allocated to residents of the City who paid a tax to fund transportation. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council January 22, 2007 Page 6 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.