Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Ortiz, seconded by Councilor Pryor, moved that the City Council adopt Council Bill <br />4943, an ordinance amending the Metro Plan and Willakenzie Area Plan. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman expressed concern that redesignating the area would create the opportunity for <br />commercial development, potentially including a strip mall. She asked what kind of influence the Planned <br />Unit Development (PUD) process had and whether or not the council had any influence at this point in order <br />to ensure that any commercial development would be small-scale. <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor asked Associate Planner for the Planning and Development, Lydia McKinney, to <br />speak to the question. <br /> <br />Ms. McKinney explained that the base zone would be medium density residential use and commercial use <br />would only be permitted in the zone district through a PUD process and would be required to be at the level <br />at which it would serve the residents of the PUD. She said there was also a policy in the Willakenzie Area <br />Refinement Plan that supported the limitation of commercial uses. She related that staff had sought advice <br />from legal counsel as to how commercial uses could be further limited should the ordinance be approved <br />because of the Willakenzie Area Plan policy that supported having some commercial use. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Bettman, Ms. McKinney stated that the area in question was <br />comprised of seven acres. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked what the absolute minimum of dwelling units per acre there would be. Ms. <br />McKinney responded that the minimum would be approximately 67 residential units. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked what commercial development would be permitted with the ordinance. Ms. <br />McKinney replied that she could only think of one residential PUD that allowed commercial development, <br />Valley River Village. She explained that it had gone through the PUD process and had commercial <br />development that included a bagel shop and a gas station. She noted that the PUD included well over 1,000 <br />dwelling units. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman asked if a gas station would be a permitted use if the council approved of the ordinance. <br />Ms. McKinney replied that she did not believe this was a permitted use within the Willakenzie Area <br />Refinement Plan. She also did not think the argument could be made that a gas station would be a <br />neighborhood commercial use that would serve less than 200 residents. <br /> <br />In response to a follow-up question from Councilor Bettman, Ms. McKinney clarified that the minimum <br />residential density would be calculated on the entire acreage and would not be calculated after commercial <br />use was factored in. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon asked on behalf of a constituent how the change would reduce existing transportation <br />impacts given that residential use would be increased. Ms. McKinney replied that the land was currently <br />zoned Industrial and industrial uses had a much higher traffic impact than residential uses. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon asked if old Coburg Road would come under the jurisdiction of the City of Eugene. Ms. <br />McKinney responded that this had not happened yet but it would be part of the process. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka asked for clarification of the commercial use policies. Ms. McKinney responded that the <br />commercial uses permitted in the PUD would have to be in the C-1 category, i.e. neighborhood commercial. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council March 12, 2007 Page 13 <br /> Regular Meeting <br />