Laserfiche WebLink
into the city. He said given the discontent, particularly in the River Road/Santa Clara areas, and the <br />fragmented development patterns, it would be good if there was a funding source available for the City to <br />pursue in order to provide a means of bringing people together such as facilitation or mediation. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked if the bill applied to a situation in which an unincorporated area, such as Santa Clara, <br />wanted to become a city. Mr. Yeiter replied that it potentially could apply in that situation. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman questioned why funding would be provided for something she averred was inconsistent with <br />Eugene’s legislative policies. Mr. Yeiter responded that the Metro Plan allowed for the River Road area and <br />Santa Clara to become their own cities, but potential attempts to do so had failed thus far. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to change the position on the bill to Priority <br />2 Monitor. The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />HB 3304 <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson stated that this was one of the bills to be taken up by the aforementioned work group. <br /> <br />Mr. Yeiter said the bill would allow a vote to be taken if a city wanted to annex an island of unincorporated <br />properties. He related that the current law was not stated clearly and different cities had interpreted it <br />differently. He explained that staff recommended opposition to it because it ran against council policy by <br />precluding methods of consolidating areas inside the UGB. <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson noted that representatives of Eugene were on the work group that was addressing all of the <br />annexation bills. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor, seconded by Mayor Piercy, moved to change the recommended stance on the <br />bill to Monitor. The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />HB 3343 <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to change the recommended stance on the <br />bill from Priority 1 Monitor to Priority 1 Oppose. The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />Mr. Yeiter related that the Bethel School District owned property outside of the UGB and taking a position <br />to oppose the bill could place the City of Eugene in opposition to one of its school districts. Ms. Bettman <br />responded that there was a process that the school district could utilize to get an exception in order to build a <br />school on the property. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy said it was important that the City’s opposition not be construed as being in opposition to the <br />Bethel School District. She averred that the process that was in place was adequate and would address the <br />school district’s need to build a school on that property. <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson noted that there was a hearing on the bill on the following day and asked if the CCIGR would <br />like her to speak on behalf of the City. Ms. Bettman said it would be good if Ms. Wilson would speak to the <br />bill and also emphasize that Eugene had supported funding for the Bethel School district. <br /> <br />HB 3371 <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson stated that this bill was not one of the bills being taken up by the work group. <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations April 5, 2007 Page 7 <br />