My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: Ratification of Intergovernmental Relations Committee Actions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 05/14/07 Meeting
>
Item 3: Ratification of Intergovernmental Relations Committee Actions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:45:22 PM
Creation date
5/10/2007 9:28:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/14/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Wilson added that the bill seemed dead. <br /> <br />HB 3018 <br /> <br />Mr. Jones stated that the bill increased vehicle registration fees, a portion of which went to projects of <br />statewide significance. He added that “statewide significance” was notably not defined. He believed that <br />there was a possibility that a portion of this money could be distributed to cities and counties. He said the <br />disposition of the remainder of the money was not clear at this time. He stated that the bill did not seem to <br />be moving. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Pryor, moved to change the stance to Monitor. The motion <br />passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor noted that the bill also deleted the requirement that vehicle registration fees be approved by <br />county voters. He asked if that indicated that the Lane Board of County Commissioners could pass a <br />vehicle registration fee without having to go to a vote. Mr. Jones affirmed this was true. <br /> <br />HB 3413 <br /> <br />Mr. Jones stated that the bill specified what projects of statewide significance were. He stated that it was <br />not a helpful definition for the region because of the nature of the May, 2002, list. He noted that it also did <br />not include operations, maintenance, and preservation as a defined use. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Pryor, moved to adopt a Priority 2 Oppose position on the <br />bill with a proposed amendment to update the project list to include local OM&P projects. <br />The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />SB 855 <br /> <br />Mr. Jones thought the bill mirrored HB 2778 which had already received a hearing. <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson thought the bill was dead. <br /> <br />Mr. Jones suggested the CCIGR adopt a Monitor stance on the bill. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved to take a Monitor stance. The motion passed <br />unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />HB 2200 <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Pryor, moved to increase the priority given the bill to a Pri- <br />ority 2 Support. The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />SB 2 <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson reported that this bill already passed through the Senate on a 21:7 vote. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Pryor, moved to increase the priority given the bill to Prior- <br />ity 1 Support. The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations April 12, 2007 Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.