My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: Ratification of Intergovernmental Relations Committee Actions
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 05/14/07 Meeting
>
Item 3: Ratification of Intergovernmental Relations Committee Actions
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:45:22 PM
Creation date
5/10/2007 9:28:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/14/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Pryor asked about the current law and what the bill changed. Ms. Daut said the law currently <br />encouraged employers to make accommodation for breast feeding available. The bill was more specific than <br />that. She had not recommended support for the bill because of the council’s policy related to mandates. <br />Ms. Daut noted that initially, the bill was targeted at school districts. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said breastfeeding was a health issue for both mother and baby as well as a gender equity <br />issue. She believed that breast-feeding mothers were discriminated against in the work place. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor also supported the bill. <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson noted that the bill had passed the House. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Pryor, moved to change the status of the bill to Priority 3, <br />Support. The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />HB 2761 <br /> <br />Ms. Feldman recommended the committee take a position of monitor on the bill, which would allow cities, <br />counties, and special districts to employ instant runoff voting. She noted that the Association of County <br />Clerks was very opposed to the bill because should individual jurisdictions opt to do use that approach, it <br />would be the jurisdiction’s responsibility to cover all the added costs. The jurisdiction would have to pay for <br />the needed technology or hand counting. It would require separate ballots, adding to the mailing costs. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman pointed out the bill did not mandate instant runoff voting. <br /> <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor, seconded by Ms. Bettman, moved to change the status of the bill to Priority 3, <br />Support. The motion passed unanimously, 3:0. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor indicated support for the bill because it did not mandate instant runoff voting. <br /> <br />HJR 43 <br /> <br />Ms. Feldman said the resolution was the same as SJR 17, which she recommended the City oppose. She <br />said the Oregon Revised Statutes provided for registered voters to update their registration until 8 p.m. on <br />Registration Day, or until the polls closed. This would allow those who moved from out of state to register <br />on Election Day without a way of verifying whether they voted that day in another state. Some believed it <br />would lead to massive voter fraud. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor, seconded by Ms. Bettman, moved to change the status of the bill to Priority 2, <br />Oppose. The motion passed unanimously, 3:0 <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy had concerns about people being able to register closer to the election date but was persuaded <br />by Ms. Feldman’s comments to support the staff recommendation. Ms. Bettman pointed out that with mail- <br />in ballots people had three weeks to vote and plenty of time to register. <br /> <br />SB 972 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations April 19, 2007 Page 6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.