Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT A <br /> <br />M I N U T E S <br /> <br /> <br />Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations <br />McNutt Room—Eugene City Hall—777 Pearl Street <br />Eugene, Oregon <br /> <br /> March 22, 2007 <br /> Noon <br /> <br />PRESENT: Bonny Bettman, Chair; Mayor Kitty Piercy (for Betty Taylor), Chris Pryor, members; Mary <br />Walston, Brenda Wilson, Jessica Cross, Randi Zimmer, City Manager's Office; Ellwood <br />Cushman, Eugene Police Department; Fred McVey, Eric Jones, Eric Wold, Kevin Finney, <br />Ron Breitenstein, Lacey Risdal, Public Works Department; Keli Osborn, Kurt Yeiter, Steve <br />Nystrom, Planning and Development Department; Myrnie Daut, Helen Towle, Jamie Iboa, <br />Chuck Solin, Larry Hill, Sue Cutsogeorge, Kristie Hammitt, Central Services Department; <br />Lauren Sommers, City Attorney’s Office. <br /> <br />ABSENT: Betty Taylor, member. <br /> <br /> <br />1. Call to Order and Review Agenda <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman called the meeting of the Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (CCIGR) to order <br />and reviewed the agenda. <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson noted the two grants the committee was receiving notice of, which the council had already seen. <br />Ms. Bettman determined that the committee had no questions. <br /> <br /> <br />2. Review Pending Legislation <br /> <br />HB 3163 <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman had no objection to the staff recommendation related to House Bill (HB) 3163, but had <br />questions about the difference between having jurisdiction over driving under the influence of intoxicants <br />(DUII) violations and being a court of record. Ms. Hammitt said the bill would require the Municipal Court <br />to become a court of record to maintain jurisdiction over such cases. She said that becoming a court of <br />record was cost-prohibitive and the City lacked the staff resources to support such a court. In addition, she <br />understood that it required registering with the Department of Revenue, which could involve other mandates. <br />The Municipal Court also had not sought court of record status because it did not have many appeals. She <br />did not know the rationale for the bill. Ms. Bettman wanted to know if staff preferred to oppose the bill <br />with amendments related to the mandated nature of the bill. Ms. Hammitt said staff recommended <br />opposition to the bill because the City did not want to lose jurisdiction over its DUII cases. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Mr. Pryor, moved to oppose the bill with amendment eliminating <br />the mandate related to a court of record if the bill began to move. The motion passed unani- <br />mously, 3:0. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations March 22, 2007 Page 1 <br />