My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 01/19/00 JEO
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2000
>
CC Minutes - 01/19/00 JEO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:27:54 AM
Creation date
8/1/2005 2:53:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Joint Elected Officials
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
standards. He added the plan is demand-driven and is flexible and the future capital projects <br /> envisioned in the plan will go through the regular city CIP process. He noted there are no tax <br /> dollars envisioned in the projects contemplated in the plan for either capital projects or airport <br /> operations. <br /> <br /> Philip Farrington, Land Use Consultant, Satre Associates, 132 E. Broadway, reported that <br /> planning commissions and elected officials previously reviewed prior implementing actions, <br /> suggesting that airport implementation actions be taken concurrently with and in the context <br /> of the Airport Master Plan Update. He said the Airport Master Plan shall serve as the guide <br /> for improvements to facilities and services at the airport and the document is the second <br /> update of the Airport Master Plan. He noted that the comprehensive planning approach <br /> implementing all of the needed Metro Plan amendments and zone changes to accommodate <br /> for the Greenhill Road project are considered concurrently. He added the approach results in <br /> an integration of the technical aspects for planned capital improvements that are contained in <br /> the document and the policy direction contained in the Metro Plan to support the airport and <br /> its function. He said in between the 1990 Airport Master Plan and the current update, a 1994 <br /> environmental assessment was performed and it covered different alternatives for location of <br /> the parallel runway and for other road realignment concepts. He noted the implementing <br /> actions will be consistent between the Master Plan and the Metro Plan and allows for FAA <br /> funding to support the improvements. He reiterated the extensive public involvement process <br /> and the three planning commissions have affirmed the proposals and the Lane County <br /> Planning Commission and the Lane County Board of Commissioners have already approved <br /> the Greenhill Road realignment project. He said they believe the airport represents a critical <br /> transportation component to the community and an integral part of the Metro Plan planning <br /> process and it meets all applicable criteria of approval. <br /> <br /> Bob Noble, Airport Division, City of Eugene, noted the Master Plan Updates covers a wide <br /> spectrum of facility needs for airfield facilities, airline ticket and baggage handling, passenger <br /> hold room, concessions, security, FAA and airport maintenance, educational facilities and <br /> utilities. He explained the realignment of Greenhill Road was based on the need to improve <br /> the safety concerns and eliminate a conflict point that exists with the intersection of Greenhill <br /> Road and Aubrey Lane. He noted that the FAA had mandated that corrective action take <br /> place. He added part of the reason for the update was to consider and resolve the critical <br /> concern. He said the Lane County Roads Advisory Committee had heard from the airport on <br /> the matter and has recommended approval for the realignment and the Lane County Board of <br /> Commissioners had previously approved the design and realignment in 1999. He stated the <br /> realignment of Greenhill Road was determined to be best located in a manner that would <br /> facilitate phased construction of a parallel runway. He explained the plan recommends <br /> initiating construction of a parallel runway 4,000 feet in length and then extending it 2,000 <br /> feet as scheduling and funding permits. He said the parallel runway improves safety as it does <br /> not intersect another runway as the current configuration does and improves capacity by one- <br /> third. He added the runway is needed as back-up for the primary runway for commercial <br /> <br />Page 5 -- Joint Elected Officials' Meeting -- January 19, 2000 <br />WP bc/m/00011/T <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.