Laserfiche WebLink
IMPLEMENTATION PROPOSAL FOR RECOMMENDED FUNDING SOLUTION <br />Ý·¬§ ½±«²½·´ ¿½¬·±²­ ®»½±³³»²¼»¼ º±® ·³°´»³»²¬¿¬·±² ±º ¬¸·­ º«²¼·²¹ ­±´«¬·±² °¿½µ¿¹» ¿®» ¿­ <br />º±´´±©­æ <br />May 23, 2007 <br /> <br /> ̸» º·²¿´ ®»°±®¬ ¿²¼ ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±²­ ±º ¬¸» ­«¾½±³³·¬¬»» ¿®» °®»­»²¬»¼ ¬± <br />¬¸» º«´´ ½·¬§ ½±«²½·´ô ¿½½±³°¿²·»¼ ¾§ ¿ ³±¬·±² ¬¸¿¬ ­»»µ­ ½±«²½·´ ¿°°®±ª¿´ ±º ¬¸» º«²¼·²¹ <br />°¿½µ¿¹» ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±² ·² ½±²½»°¬«¿´ º±®³ò Í«¾­»¯«»²¬ ¿½¬·±²­ ±º ¬¸» ½±«²½·´ ©±«´¼ ¾» <br />Recommend <br />®»¯«·®»¼ ¬± ·³°´»³»²¬ ¿²§ ±º ¬¸» º·ª» ®»½±³³»²¼»¼ ®»ª»²«» ­±´«¬·±²­ò <br />approval of the conceptual funding package recommendation outlined in this report, <br />and direct the City Manager to bring back the necessary draft ordinances and actions <br />for implementation of the specific revenue solutions recommended in this report. <br />May 29, 2007 <br /> <br /> л²¼·²¹ ½±«²½·´ ¿°°®±ª¿´ ±º ¬¸» ½±²½»°¬«¿´ º«²¼·²¹ °¿½µ¿¹» <br />®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±²ô ½±«²½·´ ·­ ­½¸»¼«´»¼ ¬± ¬¿µ» ¿½¬·±² ±² ¿² ±®¼·²¿²½» ¬± ·²½®»¿­» Û«¹»²»­ <br />Recommend approval of this ordinance. <br />³±¬±® ª»¸·½´» º«»´ ¬¿¨ ¾§ í ½»²¬­ °»® ¹¿´´±²ò <br />May 30, 2007 <br /> <br /> ݱ«²½·´ ·­ ­½¸»¼«´»¼ º±® ¿ ¶±·²¬ ³»»¬·²¹ ©·¬¸ ÛÉÛÞ Þ±¿®¼ ±º <br />Recommend advocating for a joint staff effort to identify the most <br />ݱ³³·­­·±²»®­ò <br />economical collection mechanism for potential new street funding alternatives (e.g., <br />street utility fee and street lighting fee) in order to minimize administrative costs and <br />maximize revenue for the repair and maintenance of Eugene’s street system. <br />June 2007 <br /> <br /> л²¼·²¹ ½±«²½·´ ¿°°®±ª¿´ ±º ¬¸» ½±²½»°¬«¿´ º«²¼·²¹ °¿½µ¿¹» ®»½±³³»²¼¿¬·±²ô <br />½±«²½·´ ¸¿­ ¬¸» ±°°±®¬«²·¬§ ¬± ¼·®»½¬ ¬¸» ½·¬§ ³¿²¿¹»® ¬± ·³°´»³»²¬ ¿ ­±´·¼ ©¿­¬» ½±´´»½¬·±² <br />­«®½¸¿®¹» ¿­ °¿®¬ ±º ¬¸» ½«®®»²¬ ­±´·¼ ©¿­¬» ¸¿«´»® ®¿¬» ®»ª·»© ¿²¼ ¿¼¶«­¬³»²¬ °®±½»­­ ¬± <br />¹»²»®¿¬» ¿°°®±¨·³¿¬»´§ üï ³·´´·±² ¿²²«¿´´§ º±® ¬®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² ­§­¬»³ º«²¼·²¹ °®·±®·¬·»­ò <br />Recommend directing the city manager to develop the necessary ordinance and actions <br />to implement the proposed solid waste collection surcharge in the current rate review <br />process. <br />Summer/fall 2007 <br /> <br /> ͽ¸»¼«´» ½±«²½·´ ©±®µ ­»­­·±²­ º±® ½±²¬·²«»¼ ­¬«¼§ ±º ¬¸» ½±²½»°¬­ º±® <br />¿ Û«¹»²» ­¬®»»¬ñ¾·µ» °¿¬¸ ´·¹¸¬·²¹ º»» ¿²¼ ¿ ­¬®»»¬ «¬·´·¬§ º»» ¾¿­»¼ ±² °¿®µ·²¹ ­°¿½»­ò <br />Recommend directing the city manager to schedule work sessions for further council <br />study of these two funding components. <br />Late fall 2007 <br /> <br /> ͽ¸»¼«´» ¿ ©±®µ­»­­·±² ¿²¼ ¬»²¬¿¬·ª» ¿½¬·±² ¬± °´¿½» ±² ¬¸» ¾¿´´±¬ ·² Ó¿§ <br />îððè ¿ °®±°±­»¼ ïð󧻿® ½¿°·¬¿´ ´±½¿´ ±°¬·±² ´»ª§ ¬± ¹»²»®¿¬» üê ³·´´·±² °»® §»¿® º±® ½¿°·¬¿´ <br />Recommend directing the city manager to schedule a <br />°¿ª»³»²¬ °®»­»®ª¿¬·±² °®±¶»½¬­ò <br />work session prior to the end of the 2007 calendar year and subsequent action for the <br />purpose of placing a proposed capital local option levy on the May 2008 ballot. <br />OTHER FUNDING ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED <br /≯» ­«¾½±³³·¬¬»» ¼·­½«­­»¼ ³±®» ¬¸¿² íð °±¬»²¬·¿´ º«²¼·²¹ ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª»­ô ·²½´«¼·²¹ ¬¸» º·ª» ·²½´«¼»¼ <br />·² ¬¸» ®»½±³³»²¼»¼ º«²¼·²¹ ­±´«¬·±²ò ̸®±«¹¸ ¿ °®±½»­­ ±º ¼·­½«­­·±² ¿²¼ ­¬®¿© °±´´·²¹­ô ¬¸¿¬ <br />·²·¬·¿´ ´·­¬ ±º íð ®»ª»²«» ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª»­ ©¿­ ²¿®®±©»¼ ¬± ¿ ­¸±®¬ ´·­¬ ±º ïðò ̸» º·ª» ±¬¸»® °±¬»²¬·¿´ <br />®»ª»²«» ¿´¬»®²¿¬·ª»­ ©¸·½¸ ¹»²»®¿¬»¼ ­·¹²·º·½¿²¬ ¼·­½«­­·±² ¾«¬ ©»®» «´¬·³¿¬»´§ ²±¬ ·²½´«¼»¼ ·² ¬¸» <br />­«¾½±³³·¬¬»»­ º·²¿´ ®»½±³³»²¼»¼ °¿½µ¿¹» ¿®» ¼»­½®·¾»¼ ¸»®»ò <br />Ú·²¿´ λ½±³³»²¼¿¬·±²­ ±º ݱ«²½·´ Í«¾½±³³·¬¬»» ±² Ì®¿²­°±®¬¿¬·±² Ó¿§ îíô îððé îï <br />