Laserfiche WebLink
a permit for tree removal for property owners, businesses and developers in the South <br />Hills. He added it should be part of the CC&Rs (Covenants, Conditions, & Restrictions) <br />that show a unique coverage for that area. <br /> <br /> Jonathan Brandt, 1821 Washington Street, Eugene, stated he is with the Eugene <br />Tree Foundation. He supported getting the tree ordinance portion of the land use code <br />back to the City Council for action as soon as possible. He supported Shawn Boles and <br />his recommendation for design standards. He supports the sections in the LUCU that <br />pertain to landscaping requirements of 15 percent and 20 percent for certain types of lots. <br />He commented that the key issue is livability and rushing into dense development will <br />create problems. <br /> <br /> Lee Beyer, 1401 Willamette St. Eugene, read his letter into the record. <br /> <br /> Kevin Matthews, 31728 Owl Road, President, Southeast Neighbors, stated he was <br />representing neighborhood presentation and a green space preservation slate. He said <br />there is good work going into LUCU, but the code is not ready for approval. He added the <br />code is not at a level where a few changes made during a work session would get it ready <br />for approval. He said the public does not know what is in this code. He said there needs <br />to be an impact analysis. <br /> <br /> David Hinkley, 1308 Jefferson Street, Eugene, stated his appreciation of the effort <br />of the Planning Commission and the City. He noted that this version is a marked <br />improvement of the others but it is not finished. He said the changes between this version <br />and the November version are 200 pages and these have not been reviewed. He stated <br />that Eugene is a city and it needs to be developed on an urban, not a suburban model. He <br />suggested a 7,260 maximum lot size for Iow-density residential lots. He noted that <br />downtown is unique and needs its own zoning classification separate from major shopping <br />centers. He said that every decision needs to have a local appeals step. <br /> <br /> Tom Corey, 3666 West 11th Avenue, Eugene, stated he is a retired real estate <br />appraiser. He said he owns the property at the south east corner of West 11th Avenue and <br />Bailey Hill Road. He suggested that 10 uses be added back to the C-4 zone as they had <br />been taken away over the past 11 years. He said it is getting harder to lease and conform <br />to the C-4 zoning. He said he investigated rezoning to C-2 but there are two obsolete <br />resolutions that were passed in 1984 that prohibit his proceeding with the zoning to C-2: <br />Resolutions 3862 and 3885. He asked the City Counci to repeal these ordinances. <br /> <br /> Dou.q McKay, 2350 Oakmont Way, Eugene, said he was concerned about the <br />building orientation entrances and the maximum front yard setbacks. He noted that most <br />retailers are attempting to satisfy the majority of their customers. He said over 90 percent <br />of all customers of retail areas come by auto and they want to park in front of the store. He <br /> <br />Page <br />10 - Joint BCC/Eugene City Council Meeting - May 31, 2000 <br />WD bc/m/00081IT <br /> <br /> <br />