Laserfiche WebLink
zones in the April draft, there is a long way to go. He noted that there is a limited amount <br />of commercial property available. He said the original draft allowed housing in C-1 and C- <br />2 zones on the ground floor. He explained that any housing that is done on top of a <br />commercial building should be a commercial zone and treated as such. He said the areas <br />outside of the downtown core would be affected by floor area ratios. <br /> <br /> Terry Connelly, 1461 Willamette Street, Eugene, represented the Eugene Chamber <br />of Commerce. He said the chamber had been involved in the land use code update <br />process from the outset. He said they presented testimony and input all along. He asked <br />the elected officials to listen to what chamber members and other citizens have to say. He <br />said that the April 2000 draft would result in many unintended consequences in the pursuit <br />of urban development. He said it is the cumulative effect of standards that will deter or <br />physically prevent the type of development to support the existing Eugene urban growth <br />boundary and growth management policies. He said they have concerns about allowing <br />single family housing in C-1 and C-2 zones. <br /> <br /> Mike Roberts, 1919 Myers Road, Eugene, read his letter into the record. He urged <br />the elected officials to direct staff to do an analysis on a site-by-site basis within Eugene to <br />see if the outcome from the land use code draft is what the community wants. <br /> <br /> Dan Montqomery, discussed the design standards for multi-family housing. He said <br />they were counterproductive in producing more compact urban development and higher <br />density. He noted that under the new requirements, 20 percent of the site is required to be <br />open space. He added under LUCU, every ground floor unit must have 100 square feet of <br />private open space. He commented that a building like the 5th Street Public Market would <br />not meet the requirement. <br /> <br /> Philip Farrinqton, 132 East Broadway, Eugene, read his letter into the record. <br /> <br /> Milton Oiler, 845 Willamette Street, Eugene, echoed Paul Vaughn's comments with <br />regard to I-1 zones. He agreed with Dan Montgomery on landscaping and also agreed <br />with Russ Svingen, Don McCrae, Tom Slocum, Terry Connelly, and Michael Roberts. He <br />said more time needs to be spent on lot analysis to see what could be done under the <br />LUCU. He added it will be overburdensome and will slow down development and reduce <br />tax revenues. He suggested making it easier to get permitting. <br /> <br /> Rob Zako, 1280 B East 28th Avenue, stated he had not had a chance to read the <br />document. He noted that he had read the Eugene Growth Management Polices and he <br />supports them. He asked the elected officials to get the policies implemented. <br /> <br /> Shawn Boles, 105 North Adams Street, said there is an absence of a design review <br />committee that is strong enough to provide the community with a quality of life that it <br /> <br />Page <br />5 - Joint BCC/Eugene City Council Meeting - May 31, 2000 <br />WD bc/m/00081/T <br /> <br /> <br />