Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ron Tyree <br />, 4000 Spring Boulevard, Tyree Oil, indicated his opposition to an increase due to the competi- <br />tive disadvantage it would give Eugene stations . Gas stations at the edge of the community would be able <br />to charge eight cents less than Eugene stations. Dealers in Eugene would not be able to pass the costs on to <br />the consumers, which would hurt the companies and their employees. It costs money to maintain and <br />operate stations, and if profit margins go down, companies’ investments will go elsewhere, he said. Mr. <br />Tyree indicated that it did not make sense to put money in a gas station where projects would be less. <br />Alternative fuel projects would also be affected. <br /> <br />Jim Welsh <br />, Eugene Association of Realtors, 2139 Centennial Plaza, concurred with the remarks made by <br />Mr. Connelly and Mr. Tyree. He suggested that if gas stations were driven out of the community, Eugene <br />residents would drive to Springfield for gas. He suggested that the council consider other alternatives, such <br />as bonding, to improve existing streets, many of which were an “embarrassment” to the community. <br /> <br />John Barofsky <br />, 2010 Hubbard Lane, suggested the increase was the start to an overall funding system. It <br />needed to be one piece of a broad plan to address system sustainability. He noted the council subcommittee <br />charged with working on the issue and suggested it be open to consideration of the entire transportation <br />system. Bonding, he said could help with the backlog and fix potholes, but it was not an ongoing funding <br />source, necessitating the need for consideration of such things as gas taxes. He encouraged the council to <br />forward unpopular measures to the public to ensure that the system was sustainable. <br /> <br />Paul Romaine <br />, 707 SW Washington Street, Suite 927, Portland, represented the Oregon Petroleum <br />Association, said his organization was opposed to a local gas tax but not to an increase in the state gas tax <br />of 14 cents per gallon to be distributed to the cities. He said that local gas taxes resulted in balkanization <br />because people were aware of where gas was the cheapest. He asked that the City work with the legislature <br />to ensure a State gas tax increase. He said his association agreed it would attempt to refer each local gas <br />tax increase until the State began to pay attention to the issue. If the council went forward, he asked it to <br />refer the ordinance. <br /> <br />th <br />Howard Bonnett <br />, 1835 East 28 Avenue, submitted testimony pertaining to the work of the council <br />subcommittee working on transportation issues. Mr. Bonnett supported an increase in the gas tax to address <br />the growing backlog of road maintenance. He believed that an increase of 15 cents per gallon would be <br />needed to completely address the backlog, and suggested more work was needed. He thought the subcom- <br />mittee would have to develop alternative funding sources because the City would not accomplish what was <br />needed through the gas tax alone. He suggested that timing was important because additional funds now <br />would fund needed overlays that would make future road repairs less onerous. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy closed the public hearing and in light of the time remaining, asked the council to e-mail their <br />questions to staff. <br /> <br /> <br />8. PUBLIC HEARING: An Ordinance Creating a Sustainability Commission; Amending 2.013 of <br />the Eugene Code, 1971; and Adding a New Section 2.380 to that Code <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Krisna Khalsa <br />, 70 Lawrence Street, strongly encouraged the council to create a Sustainability Commission. <br />He believed the proposal would result in a citizen organization similar to the Lane County Food Policy <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 20, 2007 Page 12 <br /> Public Hearing <br />