My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 02/12/07 Work Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2007
>
CC Minutes - 02/12/07 Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:28:24 AM
Creation date
5/17/2007 10:27:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Work Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
2/12/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a portion of the Willamette Substation and the portion east would probably not be involved in the disposi- <br />tion. Mr. Menegat said that the board saw value to EWEB as it related to economic value to reduce the <br />costs of the new facility. He said that the board was looking at multi-use high density commercial and <br />residential development consistent with the City policy. He said that the board needed some sense of <br />certainty about the value and timing of sale in order to move forward with its plans. <br /> <br />Mr. Menegat said that the bottom line questions were: What was the City Council’s position regarding the <br />value of the property? Would the City be willing to purchase the property at an appraisal based on multi- <br />use high density residential/commercial? <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy said that the council’s interest was also in how master planning would be undertaken together. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman welcomed the EWEB commissioners and thanked them for joining the council for a discussion. <br />She said that she welcomed a conversation but noted that the council had a staff recommended motion in <br />front of them and did not have the luxury of simply having a conversation. She said that the council would <br />have to deliberate to a conclusion. She said that this was unfortunate because she did not think there was <br />enough time for this deliberation. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked where the money came from for EWEB’s purchase of the property in 1908 and 1998. <br />EWEB staff member, Mike Overly, said that the property had been compiled by many pieces over many <br />years. He said that every piece, with the exception of the original purchase in 1908, came directly from <br />EWEB rate payer funds. He said that the 1908 purchase was made by the City of Eugene from the <br />Willamette Valley Water Company and included the steam plant and part of the property east of the steam <br />plant where the substation was located. He said that the property was included in the purchase of Skinner’s <br />Butte, the reservoir and the water systems that were up there. He said that when EWEB was formed in <br />1911, those water properties and the debt associated with them were transferred to the new utility board. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman addressed Mr. Menegat’s question about the City’s position regarding the value of the <br />property. She said that, as the council had discussed many times post-Ballot Measure 37, zoning and <br />regulation often create value. She said that in this situation in which the City had the opportunity to up zone <br />and adopt a Metro Plan amendment, the City would be creating value. She said that the number depended <br />on whether it was before or after the master plan, whether it was before people were committed to <br />transportation capacity improvements or after. She said that from the City’s point of view, this was a <br />monumental and unprecedented redevelopment opportunity. She emphasized that this was a very important <br />piece of property to the public and that she did not see the benefit of transferring the master planning process <br />to EWEB. She said that for an asset this significant to the community, the City should initiate and manage <br />the master planning process. She said that once EWEB relocated, that property would become a City asset. <br />She said that she thought that there was wisdom in the initial agreement for the City to have first right of <br />refusal and she thought that the City should exercise that right. She suggested a strategy that would include <br />a mixture of Strategy 1 and Strategy 3, in which the City would declare its intent to purchase and then <br />would include EWEB and other stakeholders in a process of doing the master planning. She said that to get <br />the maximum value out of the property would take a huge public investment and infrastructure. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown pointed out that Public Land (PL) could not be valued. He said that when he did the appraisal of <br />the land several years ago, he assumed it was non-PL and used the information he received from staff in a <br />memo that said to consider it as two-thirds commercial and one-third residential. He said that an appraiser <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 12, 2007 Page 5 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.