Laserfiche WebLink
3) “J. The more than $107,500,000 spent by Eugene taxpayers to date on the war and occu- <br />pation in Iraq could nearly eliminate our backlog of road repairs; or could have provided <br />one year of Head Start preschool for nearly 14,000 Eugene children; or one year of medical <br />insurance for more than 61,000 Eugene children; or one year of salary for more than 1,775 <br />public school teachers in Eugene; or more than 900 additional housing units in Eugene; or <br />nearly 5,000 four-year scholarships at public universities in Oregon, according to the Na- <br />tional Priorities Project.” <br />4) “Section 5. That the financial resource used to prosecute the war be redirected, as they be- <br />come available, to address the urgent needs of the most vulnerable portions of our popula- <br />tion, including education, health care and full benefits for returning veterans, as well as to <br />fund the development of non-carbon producing renewable alternatives for our energy <br />needs.” <br />Councilors Ortiz and Pryor accepted the friendly amendment. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling said while he wanted to bring the troops home, he could not support the resolution as it <br />was worded. He questioned why the council would take time to discuss an international issue when the City <br />faced so many local problems. He related that constituents asked him this question. He stated that one <br />reason he could not support the resolution was the statement asserting that $107 million in Eugene <br />taxpayers’ money had been spent on the war. He pointed out that this tax revenue had not come out of the <br />City budget; rather it was federal tax revenue. He noted that while the resolution mentioned some wonderful <br />things that the money could be spent on, it made no mention of allocating money to public safety. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon wished to respectfully thank the people who spoke on behalf of the resolution. She <br />underscored that when she ran for her position, she did so in order to make a difference in her neighborhood. <br />She averred that if a citizen wished to influence national policy, he or she could do so by contacting <br />Representative DeFazio, Senator Smith, and Senator Wyden. She said she had opposed these types of <br />resolutions in the past and would oppose this one as well. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark supported getting the troops home. He also felt his purpose was to serve local governance. <br />He had heard constituents say that taking on an international issue was a waste of council time. He stressed <br />that the City had pressing problems on which it could make a direct impact, while the war in Iraq was an <br />issue it could have no direct impact on. He read a statement allegedly written by a soldier in Iraq in support <br />of the war in Iraq. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor said he was 100 percent for local governance. He felt it was important to occasionally take <br />some time to talk in regard to significant issues. He appreciated Councilor Zelenka’s amendments and he <br />appreciated the section that advocated for providing enough funds to keep the troops safe while evacuating. <br />He averred that if enough communities came together, a message could be sent. He indicated his support for <br />the resolution. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz declared that when she ran for the City Council it had not just been for local government. <br />She said for her it was about the council taking a stand as leaders of the community. She stressed that her <br />conscience indicated to her that supporting the resolution was the right thing to do. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor supported the resolution. She said she was grateful to the citizens who had spoken out in <br />support of the resolution. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council March 12, 2007 Page 6 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />