Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Bettman wanted to know whether the issue was really urgent. She was concerned that waiving <br />the FAR would cause other regulations that existed before the Land Use Code Update (LUCU) to be <br />reimposed. City Attorney Glenn Klein responded that the claim sought only to waive the 1.0 FAR and <br />reimpose the .65 FAR and nothing more. He emphasized that the resolution would not do anything more <br />than that. He said whether the resolution was acted on at the present meeting or at the Wednesday work <br />session would not make a tremendous amount of difference, but there was a desire not to postpone until after <br />the council break because of the 180-day timeline on the issue. <br />Councilor Bettman asked if acting after the council break would supercede the 180-day timeline. She <br />wanted to know how the council could move forward without some delineation of the magnitude of the claim <br />in terms of value if the City chose not to waive the FAR. She asserted that the City had not conducted due <br />diligence in terms of establishing what the reduction of market value would be. <br /> <br />Mr. Klein responded that the 180-day timeline would be exceeded if the action was not taken prior to the <br />council break. In terms of the reduction in value, he had consulted with another appraiser and the appraiser <br />had indicated that there would be a reduction should the FAR not be waived. He said he had not asked for <br />an appraisal. He explained that while it was a valuable tool most governments were not getting appraisals <br />due to the expense. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman opined that efforts to reduce staff time were multiplying negative effects of Ballot <br />Measure 37. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy ascertained from Councilor Bettman that she opposed taking action at the present meeting and <br />action was deferred to the work session scheduled for March 14. <br /> <br /> <br />4. ACTION: <br /> <br />Ratification of Intergovernmental Relations Committee Actions of February 6, 2007, and Direction <br />on Legislative Policy <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz, seconded by Councilor Pryor, moved to ratify the Intergovernmental Relations <br />Committee Actions as set forth in the minutes of the February 6, 2007, meeting. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor requested to pull SB 187, SB 335, SB 476, HB 2465, SB 293, and HB 2140 for discus- <br />sion. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion to ratify the Intergovernmental Relations Committee Actions with the <br />exception of six bills pulled for discussion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor explained that the bills that he pulled for discussion had resulted in a 2:1 vote by the <br />Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations (CCIGR). He thought it would be appropriate to <br />discuss the bills in order to confirm the CCIGR vote or to take a different position if the majority so chose. <br /> <br />SB 187 <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor explained that SB 187 directed the Land Conservation and Development Commission <br />(LCDC) to encourage local governments to provide affordable housing. He noted that Urban Services <br />Manager for the Community Development Division of PDD, Richie Weinman, recommended that the stand <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council March 12, 2007 Page 8 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />