My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Agenda Packet 4-13-20 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Public Meetings
>
CMO
>
2020
>
4-13-20
>
Agenda Packet 4-13-20 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/10/2020 9:38:11 AM
Creation date
4/10/2020 9:35:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City_Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Packet
City_Council_Meeting_Type
Meeting
City_Council_Meeting_Date
4/13/2020
City_Council_Effective_Date
4/13/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES – Eugene City Council Work Session February 10, 2020 Page 1 <br />MINUTES <br />Eugene City Council <br />Harris Hall, 125 East 8th Avenue <br />Eugene, Oregon 97401 <br />February 10, 2020 <br />5:30 p.m. <br />Councilors Present: Betty Taylor, Emily Semple, Alan Zelenka, Jennifer Yeh, Mike Clark, Greg Evans, Claire Syrett, Chris Pryor Mayor Vinis opened the February 10, 2020, work session of the Eugene City Council. <br />1.Executive Session: Pursuant to ORS 192.660(2)(e)City Council met in Executive Session pursuant to ORS 192.660(2)(e). <br />2.Work Session: Town Square Project UpdateUrban Development Manager Will Dowdy gave an update about the Town Square Project and askedfor decision points about City Hall from City Council.Discussion <br />Councilor Clark – asked about the continued increase of construction costs and the impacts ofstate legislation on those costs; said he was hoping the City would set a budget and decide whatit can get for that, instead of making decisions before a budget is put in place; said he has askedabout how long the Downtown Urban Renewal District would have to be extended in order tofund a $22 million dollar city hall and that the voters will not support an extension; said askingfor money on the ballot to fund city hall will fail; said he would vote no on each decision todaybecause this is the wrong approach for moving forward. <br />Councilor Taylor – said she thinks the City should build for the future and not pursue a buildingthat will be torn down in 50 years; said she’d like a third choice on the first motion, includingbringing City offices that are currently renting space to city hall so that they are all in onelocation; said she thinks the underground parking is worth doing and much needed downtown,especially after the butterfly lot is removed; said she wants to first ask what is needed in a cityhall and what is good for the future of the city and then figure out where to get the money; saidenvironmental sustainability of the building is important, but not the LEED certification, andthat she supported the hybrid seismic standards. <br />Councilor Syrett – said she’s not in favor of building additional office space to lease or to houseother city offices; said she’s not in favor of the underground parking because it’s too expensiveand conflicts with goals to discourage people from driving; thanked staff for bringing the costsand options for environmental standards forward; said she supports city policy and workingtowards LEED silver certification; asked for an example of monitoring that creates the $40,000cost for administering the certification; said she’s in favor of the “safety plus” as an alternativefor seismic standards because it protects the investment in the building without needingimmediate occupancy; confirmed that the building would be insured up to $75 million dollars. <br />Councilor Zelenka – said he’s not sure cap and trade would contribute to the cost increase of abuilding and that energy efficiency would bring costs down over the long run; said adding morefloors would increase the cost and that there was an analysis done that showed the City’s leasesare cheaper than adding new building space and he’s in favor of a modest building that meetsbasic needs; said it’s important that the public meeting space be multi-purpose and overlookingthe market and plaza; asked how many underground parking spaces would be possible and saidhe was not in favor of adding it; asked how maintaining certification standards adds value to the <br />April 13, 2020, Meeting – Item 2A <br />ATTACHMENT A <br />CC Agenda - Page 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.