Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Bettman wanted to keep the CCIGR position of Priority 3 Oppose. She felt this was more likely <br />to influence the process. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon thought opposition to the bill was premature. She was willing to support the bill until <br />the amendments were available for review. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon, seconded by Councilor Pryor, moved to adopt a Priority 2 Support <br />stance on HB 2134. Roll call vote; the vote was a tie, 4:4; councilors Pryor, Clark, Solo- <br />mon, and Poling voting in favor and councilors Bettman, Taylor, Zelenka, and Ortiz voting <br />in opposition. Mayor Piercy voted in opposition to the amendment and the motion failed on <br />a final vote of 5:4. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy indicated she would support changing the stance to Monitor. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling, seconded by Councilor Zelenka, moved to change the stance on HB 2134 <br />to Monitor. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman indicated she would oppose the motion. She thought monitoring the bill would preempt <br />any opportunity the City would have to influence the bill. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling averred that if the defense lawyers and the ACLU were working on it, the City of Eugene <br />would have little influence on the outcome. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor supported a Monitor stance as it would allow the City’s lobbying resources to be spent on <br />other bills that needed attention. He added that he did not believe the bill would compromise civil liberties to <br />the extent that some people might worry it would. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka asked Mayor Piercy to explain her position. Mayor Piercy understood the bill to be <br />limited to crimes involving death, serious injury, and sexual assault specifically. She believed the people <br />who were reviewing it were trying to tighten it up in order to preserve the rights of people involved. <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson said the bill had been introduced on behalf of the Attorney General and sought to provide <br />officers the ability to intercept communications where a threat of immediate serious bodily injury or sexual <br />assault was involved. She related that because the CCIGR voted to oppose the bill she had already relayed <br />that position to the ACLU. She stated that the Attorney General indicated a willingness to work to find a <br />middle ground. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the vote was a tie, 4:4; councilors Pryor, Clark, Solomon, and Poling voting <br />in favor and councilors Bettman, Taylor, Zelenka, and Ortiz voting in opposition. Mayor <br />Piercy voted in favor of the motion and it passed on a final vote of 5:4. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor stated that HB 2370 was the “short version.” He related that the Governor requested that <br />emergency operation functions be moved from the oversight of the Oregon State Police to the National <br />Guard. He explained that HB 2370-A included an amendment that prohibited a unit of government from <br />seizing firearms from individuals during a declared emergency. He noted that at times certain civil rights <br />were suspended in an emergency. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 9, 2007 Page 10 <br /> Regular Meeting <br />