My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2H: Ratification of Actions of Intergovernmental Relations Committee
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 05/29/07 Meeting
>
Item 2H: Ratification of Actions of Intergovernmental Relations Committee
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:41:54 PM
Creation date
5/24/2007 10:18:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/29/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Piercy thought it was important to carefully choose which issues to pick to battle when things arose <br />that the unions were interested in. She opined that if one was going to fight one’s friends, it should be about <br />things that were worthy of having a fight over. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman thought the bill went too far. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman moved to adopt an Oppose position on the bill. The motion died for lack of a <br />second. <br /> <br />The staff recommendation to Monitor the bill stood. <br /> <br />SB 645-A <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson reported that the bill was moving. <br /> <br />Ms. Risdal related that she had heard the second amendment, SB 645-B, earlier in the day. She stated that it <br />was the same as SB 645-A but it allowed a business to contract for the retrieval of shopping carts. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked if the bill would target homeless people. Ms. Risdal replied that it would not. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Ms. Bettman, Ms. Risdal explained that the recommendation to oppose was <br />due to the template the bill set for a local government to enact an ordinance. She said it pre-established the <br />fine and the holding period that the government must charge if it would assume the title to the cart. She felt <br />there could be some preemption issues. She also was concerned because the increased amount of time the <br />City would have to handle the cart would not be recovered with a $50 fine. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman ascertained that the CCIGR supported the staff recommendation to adopt a Priority 3 Oppose <br />position on the bill. <br /> <br /> <br />3. Draft CCIGR Operating Procedures <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman suggested the committee review the draft one section at a time. She did not see any changes <br />necessary to Section 1. Regarding Section 2 she wanted to establish a process for membership so that the <br />committee would maintain political diversity. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor concurred, adding that the Mayor should endeavor to represent the diversity of the City Council. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor noted, regarding Section 8, the importance of having staff prepare the CCIGR. Ms. Walston <br />agreed. She said by codifying it in the operating procedures it would ensure that the briefing would occur. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor approved of the section that referred to the introduction of legislation. She felt the council <br />should think of working on possible legislation to repeal the ban on “inclusionary” zoning and real estate <br />taxes and should do so soon. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy said the operating procedures should indicate that the council might want to introduce <br />legislation at times. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor suggested that the language state that City staff or the council could introduce legislation. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations April 26, 2007 Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.