Laserfiche WebLink
<br />buildable parcels all over the City are increasingly attractive for redevelopment. Manufactured home <br />parks occupy some of these flat, easy-to-build parcels. Risk to park residents has become a national <br />issue. Park owners may wish to retire or take financial advantage of their investment when offered an <br />opportunity. In some cases, tenants may wish to collectively purchase the park in which they live. <br />However, legal remedies at the state level are needed to facilitate the financing options. Furthermore, <br />there are examples in Oregon and elsewhere where the sale price far exceeded the ability of tenants to <br />purchase the park themselves. <br /> <br />If a park closes, homeowners can be faced with a bleak situation. They may not have any place to move <br />their home to, as new parks are rarely created. Or, tenants may discover that their home can not be <br />moved due to its age or condition. Sometimes these home owners have been required by their park to <br />invest in expensive “park packages” that include paying for a driveway, a patio, or a car port. If the park <br />closes, they may be left with a debt in addition to a devalued home. <br /> <br />Two parks have closed under the City’s current ordinance. No existing Eugene parks have indicated any <br />plans to close. However, many tenants are concerned about their future and have followed this issue <br />closely. The Housing Policy Board (HPB) examined this issue and appointed a committee to study the <br />problem and make recommendations. City Councilor Jennifer Solomon chaired the committee. The <br />committee members included a park owner, a park manager, tenants, and the HPB Chair, John Van <br />Landingham. The group met eight times during a seven-month period. They listened to public <br />testimony and debated emotionally charged issues. The HPB’s recommendations attempted to <br />acknowledge and balance the rights of property owners and the concerns of tenants. <br /> <br />The proposed amendments, which would apply Eugene’s ordinance to all tenants who own their home, <br />are summarized in Attachment B. Attachment B also shows a comparison of these amendments and HB <br />2735 and SB 17A, which are currently being considered by the State Legislature. <br /> <br />The ability of the City to act is impacted by the Oregon Legislature, which is considering bills that were <br />drafted by a coalition including park owners and tenant advocates. The same bill was introduced in both <br />the Senate (SB 17) and the House (HB 2735). The coalition’s bill provides statewide protections but <br />would also preempt local jurisdictions from passing their own ordinances. One amended version of the <br />bill would grandfather in jurisdictions that adopt legislation that takes effect prior to October 1, 2007. <br />The Oregon Legislature is likely to complete its session prior to the scheduled City Council action. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />The City’s 2007 Legislative Policies, V.B2 supports legislation that provides assistance to residents <br />when manufactured home parks are closed. <br /> <br />The City currently has an ordinance in place. This action would amend the ordinance so that it is more <br />responsive to current issues and needs. <br /> <br />Two of Eugene’s Growth Management Policies apply to manufactured home park closures: <br />Policy 7: Provide for a greater variety of housing types. <br />Policy 9: Mitigate the impacts of new and/or higher density housing, in-fill, and redevelopment on <br /> neighborhoods through design standards, open space and housing maintenance programs, and <br /> continuing historic preservation and neighborhood planning programs. <br /> L:\CMO\2007 Council Agendas\M070611\S070611B.doc <br /> <br />