Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Farr requested that councilors indicate by a show of hands their support for Mr. Meisner, Ms. <br />Nathanson, and Ms. Taylor. Ms. Nathanson received four votes; Mr. Meisner received three <br />votes; Ms. Taylor received one vote. Mr. Farr indicated that Ms. Nathanson and Mr. Meisner <br />received the majority of votes and asked councilors to vote again. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson received the votes of Mr. Lee, Mr. Farr, Mr. PapS, and Ms. Nathanson; Mr. <br />Meisner received the votes of Mr. Kelly, Mr. Rayor, Ms. Taylor, and Mr. Meisner. <br /> <br />Mr. Farr said that his year as vice president assisted in helping him prepare to be president. He <br />believed that the president of the council should serve one year as vice president first. He noted <br />that Ms. Nathanson had served as president and vice president and in addition was the senior <br />councilor. Mr. Farr said that for such a new council, he would be more comfortable with Ms. <br />Nathanson's experienced leadership. <br /> <br />Mr. Rayor said he preferred to spread out leadership positions among councilors. He said that <br />Mr. Meisner had not yet been an officer and should have that opportunity as a relatively long- <br />serving member, which had already been accorded to Ms. Nathanson twice. <br />Mr. Kelly agreed with Mr. Rayor, adding that Mr. Meisner had observed the duties of a president <br />sufficiently to occupy that office. He said the code text was included to ensure that leadership <br />duties were shared among councilors. <br /> <br />Mr. Pap~ said his support for Ms. Nathanson was based on his experience with her work as chair <br />of the Parks and Open Space Committee, which included a very diverse group of people. <br /> <br />Mr. Meisner recollected that during the previous year's discussion, Ken Tollenaar's election to the <br />seat of vice president had been justified on the basis there was no need for a person to serve a <br />year as vice president because there was no longer a Council Officers Committee. Ms. Taylor <br />agreed, noting that she had objected to Mr. Tollenaar's selection only because he was leaving <br />office and would not be able to serve as president as was customary. She further pointed out the <br />council included three people who had served longer than two years and not been president. <br /> <br />Mr. Johnson noted that the council did not have to take action at this time. He suggested the <br />council table the issue until January 20 to avoid a situation in which the mayor had to break a tie. <br /> <br />Mr. Torrey indicated an unwillingness to break the tie as he believed the issue of council <br />leadership was one for the council to decide. He endorsed the City Manager's suggestion to <br />table the issue and resume discussion on January 20. The council agreed to table the issue until <br />January 20. <br /> <br /> D. Reconsideration of Eugene City Council Resolution 4469 as Requested by the <br /> City of Springfield Related to an Amendment to the Metropolitan Plan to Expand <br /> the Urban Growth Boundary to Include the Site Known as the Springfield Sports <br /> Center <br /> <br />Planning Director Jan Childs introduced the item. She said that the council would consider a <br />resolution on January 25 to reconsider a decision it made in 1995 to opt into an urban growth <br />boundary (UGB) amendment sought by Springfield. Ms. Childs said that the amendment referral <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council January 13, 1999 Page 6 <br /> 11:30 a.m. <br /> <br /> <br />