My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 02/08/99 Mtg
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
1999
>
CC Minutes - 02/08/99 Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 10:28:17 AM
Creation date
8/2/2005 3:30:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br /> <br /> Eugene City Council <br /> Council Chamber--City Hall <br /> <br /> February 8, 1999 <br /> 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Scott Meisner, Pat Farr, David Kelly, Bobby Lee, Nancy <br /> Nathanson, Gary PapS, Gary Rayor, Betty Taylor. <br /> <br />Mayor James Torrey called the February 8, 1999, meeting of the Eugene City Council to order at <br />7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> 1. PUBLIC FORUM <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey reviewed guidelines for testimony in the Public Forum. <br /> <br />David Hinkley, 1308 Jefferson Street, stated that traffic calming had been discussed at recent <br />meetings of the Budget Committee, using the example of the effectiveness of small diverter <br />projects placed in the Westside Neighborhood. He said such diverter projects would only be <br />successful if the nature of the streets on which they were to be used was known. He said the <br />Arterial and Collector Street Plan to be presented to the council was not the result of a logical <br />planning process, but a "snapshot" of how streets were currently used. He suggested that such <br />a classification process would eventually lead to all streets becoming arterials or collectors. He <br />recommended that approval of diverter projects be postponed until a true street plan was <br />prepared. <br /> <br />James Silke, 2225 Shields Avenue, stated that he was owner of Silke Communications. He <br />encouraged the council to study what had resulted from creation of the Eugene <br />Telecommunications "sales tax." He said the ordinance had forced one paging business to close <br />and another to move outside the City limits. He said he had been informed that equipment used <br />for customer billing in his business had to be located outside the City to avoid paying the tax. He <br />said the tax could not be passed on to his customers because it would make his rates non- <br />competitive. He suggested that the ordinance was hostile to business. <br /> <br />Mayor Torrey stated that it had recently been agreed that councilors would be permitted to make <br />relevant comments following the Public Forum. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson requested that staff provide information to the council about telecommunication <br />businesses begun and continued to be located in Eugene since creation of the <br />Telecommunications ordinance. She said nothing in the ordinance prohibited passing on of fees <br />to customers and asked that its provisions be clarified for councilors. She also asked for <br />information about other Oregon cities contemplating similar ordinances. <br />Mayor Torrey closed the Public Forum. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 8, 1999 Page 1 <br />7:30 p.m. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.