Laserfiche WebLink
council that the ordinances were due to expire March 31, 1999. She introduced the officer <br />assigned to the downtown mall, Scott Fellman. <br /> <br />Lieutenant McDermed provided a presentation to the council on the impacts of the ordinances <br />since their adoption in 1998, comparing crime statistics on the mall for 1998 and 1999. <br /> <br />Officer Fellman described how the ordinances were implemented by the department. He <br />provided statistics on the number of exclusions issued on the mall. Officer Fellman discussed <br />the mall closure ordinance, reporting it had been violated rarely. <br /> <br />Officer Fellman highlighted ongoing problems in the mall, including drug sales and use, graffiti <br />and vandalism, and potential issues on the mall, including the proximity of the new library to the <br />mall and the completion of the Broadway Place development. He discussed methods the <br />department used to address those issues. <br /> <br />Officer Fellman urged the council to retain and make permanent the mall exclusion and mall <br />closure ordinances, saying they were an important tool in eliminating the problems of failure to <br />appear at courts, preventing huge crowds from forming on the mall, and promoting responsible <br />use of the public space. He noted a proposed revision to the mall closure ordinance eliminating <br />an alley 160 feet off Willamette Street from the provisions of the ordinance, and a proposed <br />revision to add one block of Broadway from Willamette to Oak streets to the mall exclusion <br />ordinance. He also asked the council to include wilful violation of the mall rules to the exclusion <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee suggested that crime rate comparisons of July to December 1997 and July to December <br />1998 indicated the crime rate had decreased by 30 percent. He asked how that was <br />accomplished. Officer Fellman suggested it was the result of hard work. Mr. Lee asked why the <br />ordinances were needed if the crime rate was falling. Officer Fellman said that his <br />recommendation was based on the specific decrease in activity on the mall after the ordinances <br />were enacted. Mr. Lee pointed out that all areas of the city had experienced decreases in crime. <br />Officer Fellman said that the ordinances were not the only factor in reducing crime, but they had <br />a significant impact and he did not think staff would have made the progress it had on the mall <br />without the ordinances. He said that he would have to look at all areas more specifically to <br />answer Mr. Lee's questions more fully. Lieutenant McDermed said that in other pads of the city <br />the department had implemented other prevention-related measures to reduce the level of crime. <br />She said that the mall was a unique area that required additional tools. <br /> <br />Officer Fellman said that reducing crime activity on the mall may have reduced crime in other <br />areas. <br /> <br />Mr. Lee asked if the Municipal Court judge had thrown out any mall exclusions. Officer Fellman <br />said one exclusion was thrown out because the officer was not notified of the hearing. <br />Lieutenant McDermed added that the use of the ordinances was limited to the beat officers on <br />the mall to ensure consistency in how they were used. <br /> <br />Ms. Nathanson was pleased that the Municipal Court judge and staff were involved in the <br />ordinance review. She suggested that staff would not have recommended inclusion of the willful <br />violation of the mall rules in the ordinance unless it had experienced such violations. Officer <br />Fellman concurred. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council February 10, 1999 Page 7 <br />11:30 a.m. <br /> <br /> <br />