Laserfiche WebLink
<br />permit application to the City no sooner than 30 days, and no later than 60 days, after providing the <br />notice of intent to close. The owner must post a copy of the entire application in a conspicuous <br />place within the manufactured dwelling park. The City has 30 days to review the application and <br />issue a report. The owner must also post a copy of the staff report. The City Manager then may <br />issue or deny the requested permit. If the permit is issued, , the park owner must promptly notify <br />each affected tenant in writing of the decision and the City will notify each property owner within <br />100 feet of the decision. The City’s decision may be appealed within 10 days by any person affected <br />by the decision. <br /> <br /> <br />2.Councilor Bettman had questions regarding the possible waiver of system development charges <br />(SDC). During the council’s work session, staff explained the discussion and compromises from the <br />Housing Policy Board Committee that led to these recommendations. Some on the committee <br />advocated for the park owner, homeowner, state and local jurisdiction (City) to each share in the <br />financial solution for assisting displaced homeowners. Staff reported to the council that the only <br />identified portion that may actually fall to Eugene was a potential SDC credit that could be <br />transferred from the old development to the new development. As a clarification, no SDC credits are <br />included in the draft ordinance or staff recommendations. Rather, this is only an option that is <br />sometimes available in any redevelopment situation -- where some infrastructure improvements have <br />already been paid for at the site and therefore, constitute a credit toward those assessed on new <br />development. <br /> <br /> <br />3.Mayor Piercy asked for a comparison of the benefits of the City’s proposed ordinance amendments <br />and the proposed state legislation. This comparison is provided in a chart attached as Attachment B <br />to this AIS. The most significant differences between the two are the requirement of a housing <br />counselor to assist homeowners and the payment that a homeowner may receive in advance of <br />moving. In Eugene’s proposal it ranges from $11,000 (single wide), to $17,000 (double wide), and <br /> <br />$21,000 (triple wide). In the state bill it is $5,000, $7,000 and $9,000 for comparable homes. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />The City’s 2007 Legislative Policies, V.B2 supports legislation that provides assistance to residents <br />when manufactured home parks are closed. <br /> <br />The City currently has an ordinance in place. This action would amend the ordinance so that it is more <br />responsive to current issues and needs. <br /> <br />Two of Eugene’s Growth Management Policies apply to manufactured home park closures: <br /> Policy 7: Provide for a greater variety of housing types. <br /> Policy 9: Mitigate the impacts of new and/or higher density housing, in-fill, and redevelopment on <br /> neighborhoods through design standards, open space and housing maintenance programs, <br /> and continuing historic preservation and neighborhood planning programs. <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br /> <br />The council may adopt, amend, or reject this proposal. Action is tentatively scheduled for July 9, 2007. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2007 Council Agendas\M070625\S0706253.DOC <br />