Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Poling, seconded by Mr. Clark, moved to call the question. The vote on the motion was <br />a 4:4; Ms. Bettman, Ms. Taylor, Mr. Zelenka, and Ms. Ortiz voting no, and Ms. Solomon, <br />Mr. Poling, Mr. Clark, and Mr. Pryor voting yes. Mayor Piercy voted in opposition to the <br />motion and it failed on a final vote of 5:4. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy said the Beam proposal currently proposed to use the Aster site for surface parking, which she <br />did not think was the best use of the property. The company indicated the proposal was a placeholder as it <br />believed there was a better use for it. She asked KWG about innovative solutions to helping local <br />businesses to stay within the project footprint, and representatives of the firm indicated they had ideas about <br />how that could occur. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka said the MOU would commit the City to KWG and Beam as partners, but the details would <br />remain to be worked out. He noted his proposal called for relocation and transition planning for local <br />businesses. He did not think the Beam proposal took the City much farther than it had been five years ago, <br />when the Washburn and Centre Court buildings were fully occupied. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka said he would propose two amendments to his motion, one that the work of the committee be <br />done by the end of August and one incorporating elements of Ms. Bettman’s motion. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said she received a call from the owner of Lucky’s Tavern who said her property had not been <br />optioned and she did not want to sell. She indicated she knew of at least two other owners whose properties <br />were not optioned and who did not want to sell, but whose properties were included in the footprint of the <br />KWG proposal. She thought it overly optimistic to think the public process could be completed in three <br />months. She thought going forward with the KWG proposal was a big mistake and that it was also a <br />mistake to presume the businesses who did not want to sell would be a part of the project. <br /> <br />The motion failed, 6:2; Ms. Taylor and Ms. Bettman voting yes. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka amended his motion, with the concurrence of his second, Ms. Ortiz, as follows: <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka, seconded by Ms. Ortiz, moved to select Beam and KWG as the developers for <br />the West Broadway project, and to direct the agency director to initiate actions related to <br />agreements with the developers, a public process that includes a citizen advisory committee <br />with an independent planner/facilitator whose work will be completed by the end of August <br />in time for City Council action in September after summer break. As pertains to the re- <br />maining portion of the West Broadway development site footprint, the motion further di- <br />rects the agency director to secure the services of a qualified urban planner to oversee the <br />public process for the remainder of the West Broadway development site footprint, and to <br />establish a West Broadway Development Advisory Committee to work with a qualified ur- <br />ban designer to identify preferred design elements, mix of uses for the remaining footprint <br />of the West Broadway development site, as well as a transition plan for existing businesses. <br />The ad hoc committee shall be comprised of 11 members, one each appointed by a council <br />member and three by the mayor. In addition, the agency director shall secure services of a <br />qualified consultant to perform a market analysis and economic feasibility studies for the <br />remaining portion of the site. This research and analysis will inform the Urban Renewal <br />Agency and ad hoc committee’s deliberations. Option agreements, financial tools, and a re- <br />location transition plan consistent with the agency’s May 9 discussion, with all proposed <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council May 9, 2007 Page 8 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />