My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2007
>
CC Agenda - 07/09/07 Meeting
>
Item 2A: Approval of City Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:25:03 PM
Creation date
7/6/2007 8:37:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/9/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Responding to a question from Ms. Taylor, Mr. Yeiter said that a pending bill would allow a property <br />across the street from an annexed property to be considered contiguous. <br /> <br />The motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy noted the time and asked the council for a motion to extend time for the discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark, seconded by Mr. Poling, moved to continue discussion on the item for 10 min- <br />utes. The motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman expressed concern that using the UGB to create an island would allow for involuntary <br />annexations. She could support the use of streets and waterways for voluntary annexations. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling thought there might be times when the City needed to use streets and waterways for island <br />annexations. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark suggested the council consider the environment; the likelihood the boundary commission would be <br />abolished was high, and he thought giving staff some latitude was acceptable since the council would <br />consider each annexation and it would be the subject of a public hearing <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Taylor, moved that the council did not support the use of <br />streets and waterways as boundaries for involuntary annexations. <br /> <br /> City Manager Taylor reminded the council that the motion spoke to legislation that was intended to govern <br />every municipality in the state. He said that other communities might find it desirable to use both waterways <br />and streets in annexations, although the Eugene council might choose not to. He did not recommend making <br />it a prohibition statewide. Ms. Bettman argued that the City was taking positions on bills consistent with <br />what worked for the City, although she acknowledged the potential statewide impacts. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling, seconded by Ms. Solomon, moved to amend the motion by stating the City sup- <br />ported the use of streets and waterways as boundaries for island annexations unless the <br />UGB and city limits can be used as a border for annexation, following a public hearing and <br />council approval. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling said that the amendment to the motion would retain the City’s ability to use the island annexation <br />process. <br /> <br />The amendment to the motion passed, 5:3; Ms. Taylor, Ms. Bettman, and Ms. Ortiz voting <br />no. <br /> <br />The main motion passed, 5:3; Ms. Taylor, Ms. Bettman, and Ms. Ortiz voting no. <br /> <br /> Extraterritorial extension of services should not be allowed other than provided by the Metro Plan? <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman, seconded by Ms. Ortiz, moved to process annexations in a manner to be con- <br />sistent with the Metro Plan policies. The motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br /> Oppose required votes by general public for individual annexations? <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 11, 2007 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.