My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 04/14/99 JEO
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
1999
>
CC Minutes - 04/14/99 JEO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:28:11 AM
Creation date
8/2/2005 3:33:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Joint Elected Officials
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/1/1999
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
lack of tax-supported library services in unincorporated areas, but there is planning that needs <br /> to be coordinated. <br /> <br /> Carlson noted that regarding intergovernmental coordination, the Metro Plan is a unique <br /> document that actually covers two cities. He added there are existing structures in place to <br /> deal with intergovernmental issues. He said for the most part, the result of the urban <br /> transition project and the language in the Metro Plan indicates that annexation is the ultimate <br /> solution to many of the urban transition issues, and the cities are the logical providers of those <br /> types of urban services. He said the County is the logical choice for many other types of <br /> services including elections, assessment and taxation and corrections. <br /> <br /> Nathanson said regarding page 4 of the handout, on the building services, that Springfield <br /> handles legislative issues and Eugene doesn't. She wanted an example ora recent legislative <br /> issue that Lane County handled for Eugene. <br /> <br /> Carlson responded that the West Eugene Wetlands would be an example of a legislative-type <br /> activity where the Lane County Planning Commission was involved. He noted that the Land <br /> Use Code Update was another example where the Eugene Planning Commission had done <br /> most of the work, but it would be going to the Lane County Planning Commission, and action <br /> by the Lane County Board of Commissioners. <br /> <br /> Nathanson noted that on page 7, the issue of an equalization charge was absent. <br /> <br /> Kelly requested a history of the transition process where Springfield made one choice and <br /> Eugene made another choice, or if the decision came down from the County level. <br /> <br /> Jim Johnson, Eugene City Manager, recalled that the City of Springfield desired to handle it <br /> that way in their jurisdiction. He added it wasn't an issue for the City of Eugene or Lane <br /> County. <br /> <br /> Kelly said that Springfield's process seemed more straightforward. <br /> <br /> Mayor Maine said she appreciated their cooperative agreements and their coordinated efforts <br /> and the flexibility to allow them to implement what best suits their jurisdiction. She wanted <br /> clarification of a statement with regard to policing services. She said if the ultimate goal in <br /> the boundary is annexation for a full compliment of urban services, a statement was made that <br /> the County should provide urban level policing until such time as there is annexation. She <br /> said they are contradictory statements because there would be no incentives. <br /> <br /> Carlson responded that if he said the County should provide the service, he misspoke. He <br /> said he meant there is inadequate service and the County does not have the resources to <br /> provide it. <br /> <br />Page 5 -- Joint Elected Officials Meeting -- April 14, 1999 <br />WP bc/m/99039/T <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.