Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Councilor Bettman commented that it would be a tough choice. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz averred that Ms. Young would be a good choice, given her history with the Human Rights <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion to amend passed, 5:3; councilors Taylor, Ortiz, and Zelenka vot- <br />ing in opposition. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the main motion passed, as amended, 7:1; Councilor Ortiz voting in opposi- <br />tion. <br /> <br /> <br />3. ACTION: <br /> <br />An Ordinance Concerning Motor Vehicle Fuel Dealer’s Business Licenses; Repealing Section 3 of <br />Ordinance 20337; and Amending Section 3.467 of the Eugene Code, 1971 <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz, seconded by Councilor Pryor, moved that the City Council adopt Council <br />Bill 4941, an ordinance concerning motor vehicle fuel dealer’s business licenses. <br /> <br />City Manager Dennis Taylor stated that the item was one of the components of the transportation system <br />funding package. He recommended approval of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark, seconded by Councilor Pryor, moved to amend 3.467(b) of the proposed <br />ordinance to read: <br />“Pay a license tax computed on the basis of $0.07 (seven cents)…” <br /> <br />Councilor Clark felt it was important that the citizens of Eugene see that the City Council genuinely <br />recognized that solving the transportation facility problem was a priority. He believed that moving some <br />General Fund moneys toward this solution as the council moved into its priority-setting session would create <br />a more viable option that would attain more broad public support. He expressed concern that the council <br />action might otherwise jeopardize the solution. He urged his colleagues to support the amendment. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling indicated his support for the amendment in the event that the main motion passed. He <br />reiterated his opposition to the main motion. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman believed there was majority support on the council to address the transportation issues. <br />She wanted to find an equitable and sustainable way to do so. She felt a carbon tax was the most sustain- <br />able approach to this funding. She indicated she would oppose the amendment. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Bettman, Executive Director of the Public Works Department Kurt <br />Corey stated that the original ordinance was unchanged with the exception of two specific areas. He assured <br />her that it explicitly excluded the expenditure of funds on new capacity. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka stated that the transportation funding proposal was a package put together with a lot of <br />thought. He opposed the amendment. He added his feeling that the tax was the most appropriate funding <br />mechanism as it was most closely akin to a “carbon tax.” <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council May 29, 2007 Page 3 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />