Laserfiche WebLink
NEIGEBOEHOOD ~CTEEISTICS: <br /> <br />If t~he parcel net your requirements identified in 1. and 2. above, <br />vhat 5earinEvould residential or nonresource related development on <br />adjacent parcels have on your decision to purchase or lease a <br />portion of the property? <br /> <br /> Both the agriculture and forest experts agreed that the presence of <br /> dvetlings ~n neighboring land and the attitudes the inhabitants hold <br /> towards standard nanagement practices ~ouid have a definite bearing <br /> on a decision ~o buy or lease resource land; ~he more houses the <br /> more likely the po~entia! for conflicts. Residences adjacent on tvo <br /> or more si~es ar~ not acceplable. Recreational uses are just as <br /> much of a problem to resource managers, however connercial~ <br /> industrial and institutional uses that are compatible because they <br /> have grea~er tolerance ~ovards resource managenen~ practices. <br />Re~pondant: <br /> <br /> The more sides v~ conflict ~hen less inclined to purchase because: <br /> - ~e more drivevays ~o residences then ~he more problems ~/ access <br /> for hauling logs. <br /> <br />Mike M. - The more developnent there is~ then requires a lover value or <br /> larger piece in order for eeo~onies of scale To york. <br /> - The more people in ~he vicini[y then ~he less desirahle~ <br /> <br />Close houses vould rule it out because: <br />If residences then people ~ould be living ~here. <br />Industrial uses or u~iti~i~s ~ould no~ be considered as <br />conflicting. <br /> <br />John S. Sane. <br /> <br />Steve <br /> <br />The more people around, then the less desirable. <br />Church canps, boy sdout camps ~ould be particularly undesirable. <br />People vith strong recreational interests vould hake the property <br />les~ desirable. <br /> <br />not purchase if property had residences on tun or more sides. <br /> <br />The more residences around then the less desirable because: <br />~ Difficulty in obtaining insurance for chemical applica~ion~ <br />- Increase possibili[y of litigation. <br /> <br />Bruce V. Would no~ purchase if residences on more ~han one side because: - Problens v/ spraying herbicides and pes~icides~ <br /> Having %o ~ake neighbors in~o consideration to move equipment. <br /> <br /> ~ Subjec~ to trespass and vandalism liabiii~y. <br /> <br />~oss P. <br /> <br />Would not purchase ff residences on more than one side for same <br />reasons~ <br /> <br />Page 19-~BIT G <br /> <br /> <br />