Laserfiche WebLink
Question b) asked a similar question~ however the dwelling would be <br />situated: in the middle of the parcel instead of off to on <br /> <br />Neighborhood Characteristics <br /> <br />Question a) asked what bearing the above circumstances wo <br />the surroundin~ land were ~,i~__~ ..... j _ ~ ~ uld have if <br />committee stated that t~ ~~u ~x~n nomes~e~ The agricultural <br /> - ~=~=~e o~ homes around the <br />would have a ' ' perimeter <br /> ma3or beaten d ~ <br /> g~ ependlng on the following factors- <br />~ the number of homes should not exceed one or two to a side~ <br /> <br /> their acceptance of normal <br /> <br /> The forest committee agreed~ citing the following reasons: <br /> <br /> - densityconflict, is the factor~ because the more ho~ses~ ~ the more potential <br /> <br /> - recreational uses pose just as much of a threat because people <br /> expect environmental amenity. <br /> - ot~er types of commercial~ industrial or institutional uses <br /> f~lly c~patib!e because the~ do n-~ -~ ..... are <br /> ~ ~ ~r~ ~ne same e×pections. <br /> <br />Question b) asked if the presence of homes on only some of the <br />surrounding land due to b~ffering by n~tural features would make the <br />parcel mor~ suitable for resOurc~~ use. The agricultural committee <br />s~at~d i~w?u~d n?t. Th? forest committee generally held to the <br />p emxse that ~eveiopment on more than one sise of a parcel <br />~isqualified it for resource use unless the buffer w~re significant. <br /> <br />Regional Characteristics <br /> <br />The question was to what extent the regional settin~ made a parcel <br />more or less appealing for resource us~. Both c°mmi{tees agreed that <br />the more the s~rOund~ngs are devoted to resource use the iess <br />manag~mentlikely thatprac~ices.neigbors Will object to or interfere with standard <br /> <br />Page 23- IT G. <br /> <br /> <br />