Ordinance No. 20226 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Throughout this findings documenL reasons are given supporting the ~hct that the subject property is identified as irrevocablsJ committed to non~res'ource use. The appropriate use For the subject property is as non-r~source. RthmI Residential (d) To provide tvrotect[ve measurexjbr riparian vegetatto~ along Class J ~treams designated as sig~,~cant in the R~tral Comprehemive Plan. No Class I streams exist on the subject property~ therefore riparian setback meas~es protectkng riparian vegetation along Class I streams is required in this findk~gs document, not Lane Code 16~257~ S~te Review Procedures. Purpose. It is the purpose oft/,& section to establish a Site Rm, iem* Permit ]vrocedure fi9r specified uses or ~Pp/}catior~ requiring comprehensive r~'iew qf Rrogosed site d~'elopment on o~der to encourage th~ most appro~riate dm'elo~me~t of the site compatible wm the neighborhood to reduce ~verse ir~pacts Con Pub)ic facilitt~$ a~d ae~ iceS' and to provid~ a health~l, stable ~cient andpleasa~t on'site e~vironment. Response: ~e hatension of the site review overlay (suffix) for the subject prope~ is to ensure that all development present and furore meets and conforms to potential deve . arbani~ion All develo . lopment ass and m%tk~g L~; Co)e i~.5~,erlt on the subject property wdl requ/~e a site reviePwt permit eval nation The Board Finds and Concludes the proposed Metro Plan Amendme with the Metro P~ . . nt and Zone Cha an goals and pohmes re ' . . age acnon corn lies Urban Growth gulatmg the designation of Rural Residential l~ds ' Botmdary, but within the Metro Plan boundary outside the TESTIMONY BEFORE THE JOINT METRO PLANNING COMMISSIONS The Board Finds there were no persons speaking in opposition nor ' ' requested Metro Plan (Ma~,~ a&~.~_d .... ;. :. ~ issues rased concerning this - ~ ..... ,~miicm [~ix ~xceprlon Criteria). The ~kst County staff issue; the subject property is, technicall , hi v addkional tet' ' ' y gh alae a iCUl s ~mon is r . _ gr rural soils and Y eqmred to support the apphcant's conclusions. testhmonyThe Boardthat:Hnds based upon the fbllowing Metro Plarmkng Corarrdssion's Public Hearing The Porters had discussions with the soils consultants, includ~ contacting Lane County Agriculture Extension OmCe about what the5, could ~ise on thi~ tS'Pe of la'~d (wet, droughty soil). These contacts indicated that without subsurface drainage and water ~gati6n rights, the best use ofthek land was spring and early summertime grazkag. 25