Ordinance No. 20226 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

based upon the evidence presented t.o,?e Metro Pta~ning Commission narrativ~ that farm use df the site is impracticable ~ and the applicait's The third County staff ~ssne: concerning perceived contradictions concerning impacts relating to future development. ~he Board Finds based upon the fo Metro Planning Commissior~ Public Hearing facts that: llowmg The adjoining land to the south is a non-conforming 20-acre parcel that is not usable for agricultural purposes, due to fill activities in the past. The land to the south, although zoned Exclusive Farm Use with a 40-acre minknum (E-40) parcel size, is actually not in agricultural ase and will nor be hq agricultural use due to past fill activities. The use of the adjoining laid to the south is more in the nature of Residential use~ than a farm use. . The surrounding RR-5 Exception Area has had no conflic~ with the uses of the subject site because the subject site. like the land to the south~ has no[ been in any agricultural USes. The future residential development of the subject site will mirror the existing bordering rural residential zoned areas to the ~,est and north. The futare residential development of the subject site will not affect the nalm~al area to the east~ due to the separation by a 10 foot high dyke system along Greenihili Road and Greerthill Road its s~l£ PublicThe Board Hearin FindSincludin based upon. the evidence, presented in the ~AppIicant's. narrative and d uring g~ g d~scussmn of Metro Plan Commmsmn members, that fu~&~e addkiona1 dwellings on the site will have no significant adverse impacts on the neighboring E~0 parcel to ~mgmg me property to the south up above the subject site 4 to 8 feet. The Board concludes based upon the above Findings that County RR~5 zoning with a County Site Review suffix will properly implement the Metro Plan policies. VL SUMMARY- The Board FLrids, based on the size~ shape, soils and location, the site is unsmtable for al!ricultural re wate '~ · - p i g outlet, lack of irrigation enterprises.r riglats, parce~ size and shape and tack of connectiOn/proximity to the arenas Commercial far~ The Lane County Board of Commissioners Finds and Concludes that all of the applicable decision criteria have been met; including those reqUked for a Developed and Committed ExceptiOn to Storewide Planning Goals # 3 and 4~ In addi~inn, the t~°ard Finds Coun~ Rural Residential 5-Ac~ Minimum with a Site Review Overlay is the pr°pe~ County zoning to impl;ment the Eugene/Springfield Metro Plan. 27