Laserfiche WebLink
Eugene -Springfield Area Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan <br />Movies for Mitigation <br />By Amanda Siok. FEMA Region 10 <br />Earthquake Program Manager <br />tile <br />Our June 2018 Newsletter featured a <br />story on the City of Eugene, <br />Oregon's public outreach efforts for <br />their hazard mitigation plan. Since <br />then, the City has been increasing <br />their reach and expanding their <br />audience in an effort to really learn <br />what their residents want to do to <br />reduce their vulnerability to natural <br />hazards. <br />In cooperation with the Eugene <br />Water and Electric Board (EWEB), <br />City of Springfield, Rainbow Water <br />District, and Springfield Utility <br />Board (SUB), they hosted a <br />"Disaster Movie in the Park" this <br />August. Using a local park, the city <br />set up voting tables where residents <br />of all ages could vote on specific <br />mitigation projects they want the city <br />to complete. The publicly prioritized <br />projects will feed directly into the <br />plan's hazard mitigation strategy <br />(Elements C4 and C5). <br />The city had other engaging booths <br />set up for the public to visit. <br />Residents could sign up for Map <br />Your Neighborhood, win prizes by <br />spinning the Water & Electric Board <br />wheel, and learn about mitigation, <br />CRS, and the city's flood programs. <br />By the time the sun went down, the <br />disaster film "San Andreas" was <br />queued up, the popcorn was ready, <br />and 150 people had voted on <br />Figure B-4. Disaster Movie in the Park <br />mitigation projects. Before the film <br />began, Jessica Gourley with Eugene <br />Emergency Management briefly <br />spoke to the audience about reducing <br />vulnerability to disasters and the <br />value of proactively strengthening <br />the city's infrastructure. Once the <br />movie was over, many residents <br />commented on wanting to prevent <br />damage to their homes and <br />workplaces. <br />An approved Hazard Mitigation Plan <br />must "document how the public was <br />involved in the planning process <br />during the drafting stage" (Element <br />A3- Local, A2 Tribal). Eugene's <br />efforts met this requirement because <br />the public helped to prioritize the <br />hazards of concern that the city <br />"should be stronger against". In fact, <br />the city of Eugene went above and <br />beyond minimum requirements to <br />fully engage input from the public. <br />The city of Eugene has done a <br />tremendous job obtaining buy -in to <br />the mitigation message, <br />meaningfully engaging the public in <br />their mitigation plan, and making the <br />required plan update a worthwhile <br />process to increase the resilience of <br />the city. Kudos to Jessica and the rest <br />of the Eugene Emergency <br />Management Team! <br />6. Appendices <br />6-32 <br />January 2020 <br />