Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution 4832 except the $30,000 job cap. He said the joint application required both parties to agree <br />on interim standards and, if there was a disagreement on interim standards related to j ob quality, the zone <br />would revert to State standards. He said that award of an enterprise zone by the State made it unlikely that <br />one jurisdiction could unilaterally withdraw the application and additional research, as well as additional <br />conversations with the County, would be necessary in order to block implementation of the zone on July <br />1, 2005. He introduced Denny Braud and Mike Sullivan of the Community Development Division to <br />review the situation and respond to questions. <br /> <br />Mr. Braud noted that the City and County were awarded enterprise zone designation, to take effect on July <br />1, 2005. He said a consistent goal had been for the City and County to have standards in place on July 1; <br />although agreement on those standards had not yet been reached as of July 1, and the zone would be <br />subject to State standards and criteria related to job creation and type of business even though there were <br />no local standards and criteria. He said it would be necessary for the City and County to reach an <br />agreement in order to have local standards in place by July 1. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly clarified that the cap of $30,000 maximum tax exemption per job created was not actually part <br />of the interim standards; it was an amendment to the resolution to apply to the State for an enterprise zone. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy acknowledged the arrival of Lane County commissioners Bobby Green, Anna Morrison and <br />Faye Stewart. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy solicited a first round of council questions and comments. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling thanked the County commissioners for their discussion of interim standards and particularly <br />Commissioner Dwyer for his motion to accept the 1997 interim standards with a 25-percent benefit while <br />continuing to collaborate with the City Council to develop permanent standards. He said that Commis- <br />sioner Dwyer was clear in his comments that a per-job cap should be part of the permanent standards <br />discussion with the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling indicated he wanted the council to take action to accept the action by the County commission- <br />ers to include the 1997 interim standards with the 25-percent benefit and immediately begin collaborative <br />discussions about developing permanent standards to include a per job cap. He asked the City Attorney if <br />that would bring the City and County into alignment. Mr. Lidz replied that it would be necessary to <br />amend Resolution 4845, adopted June 27, 2005, to delete the section related to the per job cap if the goal <br />was to bring the resolution into alignment with what the County had adopted. <br /> <br /> Mr. Poling, seconded by Ms. Solomon, moved to amend Resolution 4845 by deleting sub- <br /> section (c) of Section 1, related to the three-year tax exemption benefit limitation of <br /> $30,000 per new full-time j ob created. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling said his understanding from the Lane County Board of Commissioners' discussion of the <br />matter that morning was that by not adopting any interim standards, the State's guidelines would apply <br />and the Board of Commissioners wanted to meet with the council to discuss community standards. He <br />said commissioners' main concern was the per employee cap but they were willing to continue discussions <br />on that and Commissioner Dwyer's motion was an effort to keep the City and County working together on <br />the issue. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 29, 2005 Page 2 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />