Ordinance No. 20235 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

service standards. (4) For development sites that abut a street in the jurisdiction of Lane County, a Traffic Impact Analysis Review is required if the proposed development will generate or receive traffic by vehicles of heavy weight in their daily operations. For purposes of EC 9.8650 through EC 9.8680, "daily operations" does not include routine services provided to the site by others, such as mail delivery, garbage pickup, or bus service. "Daily' operations" does include, but is not limited to, delivery (to or from the site) of materials or products processed or sold by the business occupying the site. For purposes of EC 9.8650 through EC 9.8680, "heavy vehicles" are defined as a single vehicle or vehicle combination greater than 26,000 pounds gross vehicle xveight or cornbined gross vehicle weight respectively. %8680 A__p. proval Criteria. The planning director shall approve, conditionally approve, or deny an application for Traffic Impact Analysis Review following a Type II process, or as part of a Type III process when in conjunction with a CUP or PUD. Approval or conditional approval shall be based on compliance with the following criteria: (1) Traffic control devices and public or private improvements as necessary to achieve the purposes listed in this section will be implemented. These improvements may include, but are not lirrfited to, street and intersection improvements, sidewalks, bike lanes, traffic control signs and signals, parking regulation, driveway location, and street lighting. (2) Public improvements shall be designed and constructed to the standards specified in EC 9.6505 ~provements - Specifications. The requirement of i:mprovements based on a traffic impact analysis does not negate the ability of the city traffic engineer to require improvements by other means specified in this code or rules or regulations adopted thereunder. (3) An exception to any or all of the requirements listed in the "Standards for Traffic Impact Analyses" for development that generate less than 100 trips in any peak hour may be granted if the applicant demonstrates that the study is not necessary in order to demonstrate compliance with this subsection. (4) In addition to the above criteria, if the Traffic Impact Analysis Review was required based on EC 9.8670(4), the improvements shall also address the structural capacity of the street in the County's jurisdiction and address identified structural deficiencies, or reduction in the useful life of existing street structures related to the proposed development. Improvements may be needed to eliminate the identified structural deficiencies and to accommodate vehicle impacts to structures. Section 5{}. Subsection (1) of Section 9.8860 of the Eugene Code, 1971, is amended to provide: %8860 General Re~_uirements. (1) Concurrent Review. Zone change applications may be reviewed concurrently with certain other land use applications, but only as provided in EC 9.8005 Ordinance - 26