Laserfiche WebLink
notice to affected property owners and tenants, to alter and to revoke curb cut permits when curb cuts <br />are not constructed according to specification, are not maintained in a safe manner~ or become <br />hazardous due to traffic congestion. <br /> (6) Any person aggrieved by administrative action of the city manager or the <br />manager's designee taken under the provisions of this section may appeal the action to a hearings <br />official in the same mapmer as provided in section 5.045. When rendering a decision the hearings <br />official shall consider the criteria in subsection 7.405(3) as well as the criteria in section 5.055 of this <br />code~ <br /> <br />T407 Equivalent Street Assessment. <br /> (1) In addition to any application or permit fee required by section T405~ when <br />the owner of real property is required to obtain a curb cut permit to take access onto a srreet for <br />which the cky has given a credit under subsections 7.730(3) and 7.730(4) based upon the size of the <br />street improvements that would be assessable under subsection 7.175(2i(b), the owner shall pay to <br />the finance officer an equivalem assessment and any other fees required by the city before taking <br />access to the street. If the property has delinquent local improvement assessments against k, before <br />issuing the curb cut perm~r, all delinquent assessments shall be brought current. The equivalent <br />assessment shall be determined by the city engineer~ taking into account the city policies regarding <br />s~ze of streets assessed to benefitted property, based on the greater of the credit given under <br />subsection 7.730(3) or (4) for the street to which access is proposed or the cost at the time of taking <br />access of local improvement assessments for similar streets. As used in this s~absection "cost'' <br />includes the expenses identified in section 7.170. Any person aggrieved by the city engineer's <br />determination of the equivalent assessment may seek its review before a hearings official by <br />following the procedures in section 2.021 of this code. The petitioner shall have the burden of proof <br />in such review. <br /> (2) Nothing in this section shall prevent the city fkom creating a local <br />improvement district fbr street improvements under section 7.175 upon a determination that an <br />existing street improvement for wl~ich the city has given credit under subsection 7.730(3) and (4) <br />is determined to specially benefit property- that did not pay for the street improvements. Such <br />assessments shall be calculated uponthe greater ofthe amount of credit given by the city or the cost <br />of constructing a similar street improvement at the time of the formation of the local improvement <br />district. If a property has been given an equivalent assessment 'under subsection 7.407(1) k may not <br />be assessed again for the same street improvements. <br /> (3) Except as otherw/se provided in subsection 7.175(4)(d)2~ equivalent <br />assessments required by section 7.175 (3)~ (4) and (5) shall be paid at the time of development by the <br />person who receives a permit to develop the parcel as described in section 7.175(5)(d). The <br />equivalent assessment shall be calculated by the city engineer based on the front fbotage abutting the <br />improvement~ onthe factors listed in section 7. t 75 (5)(b), if applicable~ and fhe engineer's estimate <br />of what the costs of the im'provement would be if the improvement were constructed at the time of <br />the development giving rise to the obligation to pay the equivalent assessment. <br /> (4) A person Who receives a permit for a parcel to take access from a street in <br />additionto the street from which the parcel takes primary access shall pay an access fee in an amount <br />to be determined by the city engineer. <br /> <br />Ordinance- 14 <br /> <br /> <br />