Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Piercy expressed willingness to have that conversation if there was a possibility of reaching some <br />type of agreement. <br /> <br />Mr. Kelly raised a point of order that there was a motion on the floor. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman said that not only was there a motion on the floor, but by not taking action the council would <br />be taking action and consequently bargaining from a position of extreme weakness. She said the council <br />should act on the motion and then caucus later. She reminded those present that for every $7 in benefit the <br />City paid, the County contributed $2, and when she brought forward the cap it was based on historic <br />conversations by the Mayor's Economic Development Committee. <br /> <br /> The motion to substitute passed, 4:3; Mr. Poling, Mr. Pryor and Ms. Solomon vot- <br /> ing in opposition. <br /> <br /> The motion as amended passed, 4:3; Mr. Poling, Mr. Pryor and Ms. Solomon vot- <br /> ing in opposition. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman requested a legal opinion on the job cap being in the resolution and what impact that had when <br />the County's action was inconsistent with the City's application. City Manager Taylor said that staff would <br />report back to the council on how its motion could be implemented. He asked if discussions should be <br />continued with the County regarding a way to accept the enterprise zone. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy said she had a sense that the council would be willing to work on the issue if there was a <br />significant change on the part of the County regarding the cap. She said it was her intention to ask the <br />commissioners if they were willing to reexamine the subject. <br /> <br /> B. Work Session: <br /> Neighborhood Initiative Priority Issue Action Plan <br /> <br />This item was postponed to a future meeting. <br /> <br />C. Work Session: <br /> Context-Sensitive Design Process for Crest Drive Neighborhood Streets <br /> <br />City Manager Taylor introduced City Engineer Mark Schoening to continue the discussion of Crest Drive, <br />Storey Boulevard and Friendly Street improvements. <br /> <br />Mr. Schoening stated that his purpose was to respond to questions on the Crest Drive neighborhood <br />transportation issue, share with the council some of the neighborhood outreach that occurred and outline <br />some of the elements of a context-sensitive design process, particularly minimum design standards. He <br />related that in January 2005 the council directed staff to address the issues surrounding street design prior to <br />classification of streets. In response to an earlier question from the council, he said that the design processes <br />for Ayers Road, Delta Highway and Garden Way were funded by transportation system development <br />charges (SDCs) and the costs were carried forward into the local improvement districts (LIDs) that were <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 29, 2005 Page 7 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br /> <br />