CC Minutes - 05/19/99 WS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Farr summarized the councilors' input. He indicated he would work with HRC staff to draft a memorandum reflecting the HRC's next steps to distribute to all councilors for their input. He did not think that this was an appropriate time for the council to discuss Hyundai's guilt or innocence, but pointed out that the law that Hyundai was accused of breaking was not an Oregon law. Mr. Pap8 endorsed Mr. Lee's remarks. He said that the HRC should be allowed to do its work and the County Tax Assessor investigation to be completed. Mr. Rayor suggested the City Council ask the State Attorney General and the County to report to the City so it could share any information received with city residents. After confirming the fact with Mr. Johnson, Mr. Lee stated that what Mr. Rayor desired was occurring. Responding to a question from Mr. Kelly, Mr. Johnson confirmed that Mr. Gangle would conduct an investigation specific to the court proceedings. Ms. Nathanson believed there was general agreement among the councilors about the lack of complete information. She agreed that the public should know the council is interested but she did not think the council was ready to say anything about the issue at this point. Ms. Nathanson believed that the City was doing the right thing now by making sure that those who should be looking into the subject were doing so. Mr. Lee said that it was important for the council to have the discussion. He said that there was a high degree of interest in Eugene about race relations, and people were quick to act, speak, and judge. Mr. Lee cautioned the council against making quick judgments or offhand remarks. He believed that good things could come from the situation if it was handled gracefully. Emphasizing that he was not prejudging Hyundai, Mr. Kelly indicated his intent to offer the council a motion because he did not think silence was an appropriate response for the community's leaders. Mr. Kelly moved, seconded by Mr. Meisner, that the council do two things: 1) issue the following statement: "The Eugene City Council condemns any instance of job discrimination in our community. With regard to alleged past or present Hyundai practices, the Human Rights Commission is reviewing information and legal counsel is investigating questions of a legal nature, and further council and City of Eugene action will be dependent on the results of those processes"; and 2) that the council schedule a work session sometime in June on the Hyundai information, ideally in conjunction with the already scheduled joint council/HRC work session now scheduled on June 23, 1999. Mr. Meisner supported the motion, agreeing with Mr. Kelly he did not want to prejudge the outcome of the assessor's investigation. However, he wanted to reaffirm the council's previously unanimous stand against discrimination, and the public to be kept informed. Mr. Lee said that the public would be kept aware of the situation through the press. He appreciated Mr. Kelly's motion because it signaled the council's concern to the public. Mr. Fart supported the motion because it represented a proactive, nonconclusionary stance on the part of the council. He questioned whether the council would know much more than it did now by June 23. Mr. Kelly clarified that he was attempting to target a date when information was MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 19, 1999 Page 4 5:30 p.m.